Multiple failures stats database reference in.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b2edbec678
commit
aee38428da
@ -555,7 +555,12 @@ did not link this failure to the catastrophic failure of the spacecraft~\cite{ch
|
||||
This was not a failure in the objective reasoning, but more of the subjective, or the context in which the leak occurred.
|
||||
%
|
||||
FMEA is less useful for determining events for multiple
|
||||
simultaneous\footnote{Multiple simultaneous failures are taken to mean failures that occur within the same detection period.} failures.
|
||||
simultaneous\footnote{Multiple simultaneous failures are taken to mean failures that occur within the same detection period.}
|
||||
failures.
|
||||
%
|
||||
Work has been performed using component failure statistics to
|
||||
offer the more likely multiple failures~\cite{FMEAmultiple653556} for analysis.
|
||||
%
|
||||
%
|
||||
This is because with the additional complication of having to change between these two modes of thinking, it becomes more difficult to
|
||||
get a balance between subjective and objective perspectives.
|
||||
@ -1098,5 +1103,5 @@ All these FMEA based methodologies have the following short comings:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Impossible to integrate Software and hardware models,
|
||||
\item State explosion problem exacerbated by increasing complexity due to density of modern electronics,
|
||||
\item Impossibility to consider all multiple component failure modes
|
||||
\item Impossibility to consider all multiple component failure modes~\cite{FMEAmultiple653556}
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user