diff --git a/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex b/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex
index 39edb16..43484af 100644
--- a/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex
+++ b/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex
@@ -555,7 +555,12 @@ did not link this failure to the catastrophic failure of the spacecraft~\cite{ch
 This was not a failure in the objective reasoning, but more of the subjective, or the context in which the leak occurred.
 %
 FMEA is less useful for determining events for multiple 
-simultaneous\footnote{Multiple simultaneous failures are taken to mean failures that occur within the same detection period.} failures.
+simultaneous\footnote{Multiple simultaneous failures are taken to mean failures that occur within the same detection period.} 
+failures. 
+%
+Work has been performed using component failure statistics to
+offer the more likely multiple failures~\cite{FMEAmultiple653556} for analysis.
+%
 %
 This is because with the additional complication of having to change between these two modes of thinking, it becomes more difficult to 
 get a balance between subjective and objective perspectives.
@@ -1098,5 +1103,5 @@ All these FMEA based methodologies have the following short comings:
 \begin{itemize}
  \item Impossible to integrate Software and hardware models,
  \item State explosion problem exacerbated by increasing complexity due to density of modern electronics,
- \item Impossibility to consider all multiple component failure modes
+ \item Impossibility to consider all multiple component failure modes~\cite{FMEAmultiple653556}
 \end{itemize}