Multiple failures stats database reference in.

This commit is contained in:
Robin Clark 2013-02-17 14:18:28 +00:00
parent b2edbec678
commit aee38428da

View File

@ -555,7 +555,12 @@ did not link this failure to the catastrophic failure of the spacecraft~\cite{ch
This was not a failure in the objective reasoning, but more of the subjective, or the context in which the leak occurred.
%
FMEA is less useful for determining events for multiple
simultaneous\footnote{Multiple simultaneous failures are taken to mean failures that occur within the same detection period.} failures.
simultaneous\footnote{Multiple simultaneous failures are taken to mean failures that occur within the same detection period.}
failures.
%
Work has been performed using component failure statistics to
offer the more likely multiple failures~\cite{FMEAmultiple653556} for analysis.
%
%
This is because with the additional complication of having to change between these two modes of thinking, it becomes more difficult to
get a balance between subjective and objective perspectives.
@ -1098,5 +1103,5 @@ All these FMEA based methodologies have the following short comings:
\begin{itemize}
\item Impossible to integrate Software and hardware models,
\item State explosion problem exacerbated by increasing complexity due to density of modern electronics,
\item Impossibility to consider all multiple component failure modes
\item Impossibility to consider all multiple component failure modes~\cite{FMEAmultiple653556}
\end{itemize}