robin/Robin_PHD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

in FMMD/FMEA tables rhs column is now 'symptom', not {\dc} {\fm}

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Robin Clark 2013-09-18 08:33:25 +01:00
parent bdf231d60b
commit 9bec687779
2 changed files with 58 additions and 58 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

36
submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex
View File

@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ by forming a {\fg} with the OpAmp and the new {\dc} $IPD$.
\caption{Inverting Amplifier: Single failure analysis using the $PD$ {\dc}}
\begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{Inverted Amp Effect} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ \hline
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{Inverted Amp. Effect} & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{ } & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{Inverted Amp. Effect} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{ } & & \\
\hline
FC1: IPD LOW & & Negative on -input & & $ HIGH $ \\
@ -349,8 +349,8 @@ This concern is re-visited in the differencing amplifier example in the next sec
\caption{Inverting Amplifier: Single failure analysis: 3 components}
\begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{Inverted Amp Effect} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ \hline
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{Inverting Amp. Effect} & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{ } & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{Inverting Amp. Effect} & &\textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{ } & & \\
\hline
FS1: R1 SHORT & & -ve in high gain & & $ LOW $ \\
@ -471,8 +471,8 @@ Here it is more intuitive to model the resistors not as a potential divider, but
\hline \hline
%\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Amplifier} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{General} \\
%\textbf{Case} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{Symtom Description} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$SEC\_AMP$} & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Amplifier Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$SEC\_AMP$} & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Amplifier Effect} & \\
% R & wire & res + & res - & description
\hline
@ -668,8 +668,8 @@ The first order low pass filter is analysed in table~\ref{tbl:firstorderlpass}.\
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{First Order} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & \textbf{Low Pass Filter} & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{First Order} & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Low Pass Filter} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{First Order} & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Low Pass Filter} & \\
\hline
FS1: R10 SHORT & $No Filtering$ & $LPallpass$ \\ \hline
@ -710,8 +710,8 @@ from the $FirstOrderLP$ and the OpAmp component.
\hline \hline
%\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Circuit} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{General} \\
%\textbf{Case} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{Symptom Description} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{First stage LP1} & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{First stage LP1} & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\
% R & wire & res + & res - & description
\hline
@ -767,8 +767,8 @@ results re-used for the next stage of analysis (see figure~\ref{fig:circuit2002_
\hline \hline
%\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Circuit} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{General} \\
%\textbf{Case} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{Symptom Description} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{SKLP} & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{SKLP} & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\
% R & wire & res + & res - & description
\hline
@ -862,8 +862,8 @@ The FMMD hierarchy is shown in figure~\ref{fig:circuit2h}.
\hline \hline
%\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Circuit} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{General} \\
%\textbf{Case} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{Symptom Description} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$FivePoleLP$ } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$FivePoleLP$ } & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\
% R & wire & res + & res - & description
\hline
@ -1793,8 +1793,8 @@ determine out of range voltage limits in section~\ref{sec:ptbounds}.
\centering % used for centering table
\begin{tabular}{||l|c|c|l|l||}
\hline \hline
\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Result} & \textbf{Result } & \textbf{General} \\
\textbf{Case} & \textbf{sense +} & \textbf{sense -} & \textbf{Symtom Description} \\
\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Result} & \textbf{Result } & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{Case} & \textbf{sense +} & \textbf{sense -} & \\
% R & wire & res + & res - & description
\hline
\hline
@ -2134,8 +2134,8 @@ faults as FMMD test cases.
\centering % used for centering table
\begin{tabular}{||l|l|c|c|l|l||}
\hline \hline
\textbf{TC} &\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Result} & \textbf{Result } & \textbf{General} \\
\textbf{number} &\textbf{Case} & \textbf{sense +} & \textbf{sense -} & \textbf{Symtom Description} \\
\textbf{TC} &\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Result} & \textbf{Result } & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{number} &\textbf{Case} & \textbf{sense +} & \textbf{sense -} & \\
% R & wire & res + & res - & description
\hline
\hline

80
submission_thesis/appendixes/detailed_analysis.tex
View File

@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ FMEA study of a resistor and capacitor in use as a phase changer.
\begin{tabular}{|| l | c | l ||} \hline
% \textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{First Order} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & \textbf{Low Pass Filter} & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$PHS45$ } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$PHS45$ } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ % \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\hline
FS1: R SHORT & 0 degree's of phase shift & $0\_phaseshift$ \\
@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ FMEA study of a resistor and capacitor in use as a phase changer.
% \textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{Bubba} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & \textbf{Oscillator} & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BubbaOscillator$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BubbaOscillator$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
\hline
@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ $$ fm(BubbaOscillator) = \{ NO_{osc}, HI_{fosc}\} . $$ %, LO_{fosc} \} . $$
\begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{BUFF45} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BUFF45$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BUFF45$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
\hline
FS1: $PHS45_1$ $0\_phaseshift$ & & phase shift low & & $0\_phaseshift$ \\
@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ $$
\begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{PHS135 Buffered} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$PHS135BUFFERED$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$PHS135BUFFERED$ } & &\textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
\hline
@ -204,8 +204,8 @@ $$
\begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{PHS225AMP} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & \textbf{Oscillator} & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$PHS225AMP$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$PHS225AMP$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
\hline
FS1: $PHS45_1$ $0\_phaseshift$ & & phase shift low & & $180\_phaseshift$ \\
@ -242,8 +242,8 @@ $$
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{BUBBAOSC} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BUBBAOSC$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BUBBAOSC$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
\hline
%FS1: $PHS135BUFFERED$ $180\_phaseshift$ & & phase shift high & & $LO_{fosc}$ \\
@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ $$
\begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$SUMJINT$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$SUMJINT$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
\hline\hline
@ -320,8 +320,8 @@ $SUMJINT$ gives $$\{ V_{in} DOM, V_{fb} DOM, NO\_INTEGRATION, HIGH, LOW \} .$
\begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$HISB$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$HISB$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
\hline\hline
FS1: $IC2$ $HIGH$ & & output perm. high & & HIGH \\
FS2: $IC2$ $LOW$ & & output perm. low & & LOW \\
@ -345,8 +345,8 @@ $SUMJINT$ gives $$\{ V_{in} DOM, V_{fb} DOM, NO\_INTEGRATION, HIGH, LOW \} .$
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & & & \\
% & & & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DS2AL$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DS2AL$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
\hline \hline
FS1: $PD $ $HIGH$ & & output perm. low & & LOW \\
@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ The symptoms of failure, i.e. $\{ LOW, HIGH, LOW\_{SLEW} \}$ are collected.
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & & & \\
% & & & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DIGBUF$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DIGBUF$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
%$$ fm ( CD4013B) = \{ HIGH, LOW, NOOP \} $$
\hline \hline
FS1: $CLOCK$ $STOPPED$ & & buffer stopped & & STOPPED \\ \hline
@ -405,8 +405,8 @@ The symptoms of failure i.e. $\{ LOW, STOPPED \}$ are collected.
% \textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & & & \\
% & & & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BISJ$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BISJ$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
\hline \hline
@ -441,8 +441,8 @@ called $BISJ$.
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & & & \\
% & & & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DIGBUF$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DIGBUF$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
\hline \hline
@ -473,8 +473,8 @@ called $FFB$ created.
%\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% & & & & \\
% & & & & \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$FFB$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$FFB$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\
\hline \hline
FS1: $FFB$ $OUTPUT STUCK$ & & value max high or low & & $OUTPUT\_OUT\_OF\_RANGE$ \\
@ -515,8 +515,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}.
% \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline
\hline
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\
\hline
@ -557,8 +557,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}.
% \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline
\hline
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\
\hline
@ -614,8 +614,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}.
% \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline
\hline
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\
\hline
@ -647,8 +647,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}.
% \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline
\hline
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\
\hline
@ -683,8 +683,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}.
% \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline
\hline
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\
\hline
@ -728,8 +728,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}.
% \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline
\hline
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\
\hline
@ -772,8 +772,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}.
% \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\
% \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline
\hline
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\
\textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\
\textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\
\hline