From 9bec687779b3b1b34ebcc322745e80c82be5086d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robin Clark Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:33:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] in FMMD/FMEA tables rhs column is now 'symptom', not {\dc} {\fm} --- submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex | 36 ++++----- .../appendixes/detailed_analysis.tex | 80 +++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) diff --git a/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex b/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex index cdb6b99..6baa7e7 100644 --- a/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex +++ b/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex @@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ by forming a {\fg} with the OpAmp and the new {\dc} $IPD$. \caption{Inverting Amplifier: Single failure analysis using the $PD$ {\dc}} \begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{Inverted Amp Effect} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ \hline - \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{Inverted Amp. Effect} & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{ } & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{Inverted Amp. Effect} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{ } & & \\ \hline FC1: IPD LOW & & Negative on -input & & $ HIGH $ \\ @@ -349,8 +349,8 @@ This concern is re-visited in the differencing amplifier example in the next sec \caption{Inverting Amplifier: Single failure analysis: 3 components} \begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{Inverted Amp Effect} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ \hline - \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{Inverting Amp. Effect} & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{ } & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{Inverting Amp. Effect} & &\textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{ } & & \\ \hline FS1: R1 SHORT & & -ve in high gain & & $ LOW $ \\ @@ -471,8 +471,8 @@ Here it is more intuitive to model the resistors not as a potential divider, but \hline \hline %\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Amplifier} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{General} \\ %\textbf{Case} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{Symtom Description} \\ - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$SEC\_AMP$} & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Amplifier Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$SEC\_AMP$} & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Amplifier Effect} & \\ % R & wire & res + & res - & description \hline @@ -668,8 +668,8 @@ The first order low pass filter is analysed in table~\ref{tbl:firstorderlpass}.\ %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{First Order} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & \textbf{Low Pass Filter} & & \\ - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{First Order} & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Low Pass Filter} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{First Order} & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Low Pass Filter} & \\ \hline FS1: R10 SHORT & $No Filtering$ & $LPallpass$ \\ \hline @@ -710,8 +710,8 @@ from the $FirstOrderLP$ and the OpAmp component. \hline \hline %\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Circuit} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{General} \\ %\textbf{Case} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{Symptom Description} \\ - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{First stage LP1} & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{First stage LP1} & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ % R & wire & res + & res - & description \hline @@ -767,8 +767,8 @@ results re-used for the next stage of analysis (see figure~\ref{fig:circuit2002_ \hline \hline %\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Circuit} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{General} \\ %\textbf{Case} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{Symptom Description} \\ - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{SKLP} & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{SKLP} & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ % R & wire & res + & res - & description \hline @@ -862,8 +862,8 @@ The FMMD hierarchy is shown in figure~\ref{fig:circuit2h}. \hline \hline %\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Circuit} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{General} \\ %\textbf{Case} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{Symptom Description} \\ - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$FivePoleLP$ } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$FivePoleLP$ } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ % R & wire & res + & res - & description \hline @@ -1793,8 +1793,8 @@ determine out of range voltage limits in section~\ref{sec:ptbounds}. \centering % used for centering table \begin{tabular}{||l|c|c|l|l||} \hline \hline - \textbf{Test} & \textbf{Result} & \textbf{Result } & \textbf{General} \\ - \textbf{Case} & \textbf{sense +} & \textbf{sense -} & \textbf{Symtom Description} \\ + \textbf{Test} & \textbf{Result} & \textbf{Result } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{Case} & \textbf{sense +} & \textbf{sense -} & \\ % R & wire & res + & res - & description \hline \hline @@ -2134,8 +2134,8 @@ faults as FMMD test cases. \centering % used for centering table \begin{tabular}{||l|l|c|c|l|l||} \hline \hline - \textbf{TC} &\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Result} & \textbf{Result } & \textbf{General} \\ - \textbf{number} &\textbf{Case} & \textbf{sense +} & \textbf{sense -} & \textbf{Symtom Description} \\ + \textbf{TC} &\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Result} & \textbf{Result } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{number} &\textbf{Case} & \textbf{sense +} & \textbf{sense -} & \\ % R & wire & res + & res - & description \hline \hline diff --git a/submission_thesis/appendixes/detailed_analysis.tex b/submission_thesis/appendixes/detailed_analysis.tex index 060ea30..b14aa01 100644 --- a/submission_thesis/appendixes/detailed_analysis.tex +++ b/submission_thesis/appendixes/detailed_analysis.tex @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ FMEA study of a resistor and capacitor in use as a phase changer. \begin{tabular}{|| l | c | l ||} \hline % \textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{First Order} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & \textbf{Low Pass Filter} & & \\ - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$PHS45$ } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{$PHS45$ } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % \textbf{Derived Component} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ % \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ \hline FS1: R SHORT & 0 degree's of phase shift & $0\_phaseshift$ \\ @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ FMEA study of a resistor and capacitor in use as a phase changer. % \textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{Bubba} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & \textbf{Oscillator} & & \\ - \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BubbaOscillator$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BubbaOscillator$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline @@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ $$ fm(BubbaOscillator) = \{ NO_{osc}, HI_{fosc}\} . $$ %, LO_{fosc} \} . $$ \begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{BUFF45} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & & & \\ -\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BUFF45$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ +\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BUFF45$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline FS1: $PHS45_1$ $0\_phaseshift$ & & phase shift low & & $0\_phaseshift$ \\ @@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ $$ \begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{PHS135 Buffered} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & & & \\ - \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$PHS135BUFFERED$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$PHS135BUFFERED$ } & &\textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline @@ -204,8 +204,8 @@ $$ \begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{PHS225AMP} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & \textbf{Oscillator} & & \\ - \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$PHS225AMP$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$PHS225AMP$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline FS1: $PHS45_1$ $0\_phaseshift$ & & phase shift low & & $180\_phaseshift$ \\ @@ -242,8 +242,8 @@ $$ %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{BUBBAOSC} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & & & \\ -\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BUBBAOSC$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ +\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BUBBAOSC$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline %FS1: $PHS135BUFFERED$ $180\_phaseshift$ & & phase shift high & & $LO_{fosc}$ \\ @@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ $$ \begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & & & \\ - \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$SUMJINT$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$SUMJINT$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline\hline @@ -320,8 +320,8 @@ $SUMJINT$ gives $$\{ V_{in} DOM, V_{fb} DOM, NO\_INTEGRATION, HIGH, LOW \} .$ \begin{tabular}{|| l | l | c | c | l ||} \hline %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result} & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & & & \\ -\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$HISB$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ +\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$HISB$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline\hline FS1: $IC2$ $HIGH$ & & output perm. high & & HIGH \\ FS2: $IC2$ $LOW$ & & output perm. low & & LOW \\ @@ -345,8 +345,8 @@ $SUMJINT$ gives $$\{ V_{in} DOM, V_{fb} DOM, NO\_INTEGRATION, HIGH, LOW \} .$ %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & & & \\ % & & & & \\ -\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DS2AL$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ +\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DS2AL$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline \hline FS1: $PD $ $HIGH$ & & output perm. low & & LOW \\ @@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ The symptoms of failure, i.e. $\{ LOW, HIGH, LOW\_{SLEW} \}$ are collected. %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & & & \\ % & & & & \\ -\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DIGBUF$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ +\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DIGBUF$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ %$$ fm ( CD4013B) = \{ HIGH, LOW, NOOP \} $$ \hline \hline FS1: $CLOCK$ $STOPPED$ & & buffer stopped & & STOPPED \\ \hline @@ -405,8 +405,8 @@ The symptoms of failure i.e. $\{ LOW, STOPPED \}$ are collected. % \textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & & & \\ % & & & & \\ -\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BISJ$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ +\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$BISJ$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline \hline @@ -441,8 +441,8 @@ called $BISJ$. %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & & & \\ % & & & & \\ -\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DIGBUF$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ +\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$DIGBUF$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline \hline @@ -473,8 +473,8 @@ called $FFB$ created. %\textbf{Failure Scenario} & & \textbf{failure result } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % & & & & \\ % & & & & \\ -\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$FFB$ } & & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ +\textbf{Failure} & & \textbf{$FFB$ } & & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline \hline FS1: $FFB$ $OUTPUT STUCK$ & & value max high or low & & $OUTPUT\_OUT\_OF\_RANGE$ \\ @@ -515,8 +515,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}. % \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline \hline - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ \hline @@ -557,8 +557,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}. % \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline \hline - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ \hline @@ -614,8 +614,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}. % \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline \hline - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ \hline @@ -647,8 +647,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}. % \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline \hline - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ \hline @@ -683,8 +683,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}. % \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline \hline - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ \hline @@ -728,8 +728,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}. % \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline \hline - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ \hline @@ -772,8 +772,8 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}. % \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{failure} & \textbf{Symptom} \\ % \textbf{Scenario} & \textbf{effect} & \textbf{RADC } \\ \hline \hline - \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Derived Component} \\ - \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{Failure Mode} \\ + \textbf{Failure} & \textbf{Failure } & \textbf{Symptom} \\ + \textbf{cause} & \textbf{Effect} & \\ \hline