more work on slides, beamer is great
This commit is contained in:
parent
e0b2c99fae
commit
9b837086d4
@ -8,8 +8,13 @@
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{F.M.E.A.}
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Outline}
|
||||
\tableofcontents[currentsection]
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\pause \item Failure
|
||||
\pause \item Mode
|
||||
@ -72,8 +77,9 @@ approach in looking for system failures.
|
||||
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Rigorous FMEA - State Explosion}
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Rigorous Single Failure FMEA}
|
||||
Consider the analysis
|
||||
where we look at all the failure modes in a system, and then
|
||||
see how they can affect all other components within it.
|
||||
@ -101,7 +107,7 @@ $100*99*3=29,700$.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\frametitle{Rigorous Double Failure FMEA}
|
||||
For looking at potential double failure scenarios (two components
|
||||
failing within a given time frame) and the order becomes
|
||||
$N^3$.
|
||||
@ -119,24 +125,56 @@ double failure scenarios (for burner lock-out scenarios).
|
||||
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Production FMEA : 1940's to present}
|
||||
\section{PFMEA - Production FMEA : 1940's to present}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
Production FMEA (or PFMEA), is FMEA used to prioritise, in terms of
|
||||
cost, problems to be addressed in product production.
|
||||
|
||||
Describe process, the probability times the cost
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Production FMEA : Example Ford Pinto : 1975}
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
It focuses on known problems, determines the
|
||||
frequency they occur and their cost to fix.
|
||||
This is multiplied together and called an RPN
|
||||
number.
|
||||
Fixing problems with the highest RPN number
|
||||
will return most cost benefit.
|
||||
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
% benign example of PFMEA in CARS - make something up.
|
||||
\frametitle{PFMEA Example}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
%\subsection{Production FMEA : Example Ford Pinto : 1975}
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{PFMEA Example: Ford Pinto: 1975}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\section{FMECA - Failure Modes Effects and Criticallity Analysis}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{FMEDA - Failure Modes Effects and Diagnostic Analysis}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\section{FMEA - Criticism}
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\pause \item Reasoning Distance - component failure to system level symptom
|
||||
\pause \item State explosion - impossible to perform rigorously
|
||||
\pause \item
|
||||
\pause \item
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Failure Mode Modular De-Composition}
|
||||
\subsection{FMEA and complexity of each failure scenario analysis}
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user