Failure modes in detail skeleton introduction
This commit is contained in:
parent
5f64c79aa4
commit
112397b717
@ -143,6 +143,31 @@ it is common to term the modules identified as sub-systems.
|
||||
When building from the bottom up, it is more meaningful to call them `derived~components'.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Failure Modes in depth: A detailed look at the op-amp and the resistor}
|
||||
|
||||
We look in detail at two common electrication components in this section and examine how
|
||||
two sources of information on failure modes view their failure mode behaviour.
|
||||
We look at the reasons why some known failure modes are ommitted, or presented in
|
||||
specific but unintuitive ways.
|
||||
|
||||
- Failure modes. Prescribed failure modes EN298 - FMD91
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{resistor}
|
||||
|
||||
EN298 says......
|
||||
Parameter change not considereed for EN298 because the resistors are downrated from
|
||||
maximum possible voltage exposure -- find refs.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{op-amp}
|
||||
|
||||
Literature suggests, latch up, latch down and oscillation.
|
||||
FMD-91 states, V+ disconnected, V- V+ shorted, NOOP and Low slew.
|
||||
|
||||
Discuss why. Determine more user friendly terms from FMD91 definition.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
%%
|
||||
%% Paragraph using failure modes to build from bottom up
|
||||
%%
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user