From 112397b7177037308d109e4e8080bcddd47a5764 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robin Clark Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:55:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Failure modes in detail skeleton introduction --- .../component_failure_modes_definition.tex | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/old_thesis/component_failure_modes_definition/component_failure_modes_definition.tex b/old_thesis/component_failure_modes_definition/component_failure_modes_definition.tex index 0e6245c..341a64d 100644 --- a/old_thesis/component_failure_modes_definition/component_failure_modes_definition.tex +++ b/old_thesis/component_failure_modes_definition/component_failure_modes_definition.tex @@ -143,6 +143,31 @@ it is common to term the modules identified as sub-systems. When building from the bottom up, it is more meaningful to call them `derived~components'. + +\section{Failure Modes in depth: A detailed look at the op-amp and the resistor} + +We look in detail at two common electrication components in this section and examine how +two sources of information on failure modes view their failure mode behaviour. +We look at the reasons why some known failure modes are ommitted, or presented in +specific but unintuitive ways. + +- Failure modes. Prescribed failure modes EN298 - FMD91 + +\subsection{resistor} + +EN298 says...... +Parameter change not considereed for EN298 because the resistors are downrated from +maximum possible voltage exposure -- find refs. + +\subsection{op-amp} + +Literature suggests, latch up, latch down and oscillation. +FMD-91 states, V+ disconnected, V- V+ shorted, NOOP and Low slew. + +Discuss why. Determine more user friendly terms from FMD91 definition. + + + %% %% Paragraph using failure modes to build from bottom up %%