% % Make the revision and doc number macro's then they are defined in one place \ifthenelse {\boolean{paper}} { \begin{abstract} This paper looks in detail a the generic `resistor' as a component in safety critical designs and how its potential failure modes are taken into account in various safety design standards. A `networked resistor' equivalent to single resistors is proposed for highly safety critical measurement sensitive designs, as it has two not three failure modes to consider. \end{abstract} } { \section{Overview} Component failure modes are documented for most generic components~\cite{mil1992}~\cite{rac}. There are some differences in the failure modes that we are required to consider for various safety standards. For an example of this we can look in detail at one particular type of component, and examine potential causes of failure modes and and how various standards demands in terms of possible failure modes. For this study the common resistor ahs been chosen. } \section{Resistor Failure Modes} Most common failure OPEN ENXXX ays only consider OPEN EN298 considers OPEN and SHORT \subsection{Physical causes for a resristor short} * over heating causing a solder bridge * over heating causing the component to melt and short (wirewound) \subsection{Physical causes for a resristor open} * Over current causing the component to burn out (acting like a fuse). * vacuum conditions can cause solder joints to sublime (space ref jbis) \subsection{Physical causes for a resristor parameter change} *the resistor can react to over heating by becoming damaged so that the resistance track is internally shorted, making the part read a lower resistance *the resistor can over heat and the resistance track and be made thinner leading to a higher resistance *chemical attack could alter the properties of the resistance track. *RAC give parameter change as well this means that the resistor may change its resistance value as a failure mode. \section{Properties of a resistor network} RAC gives a resistor network as having only failure modes of OPEN and SHORT. Let us consider a simple resistoir network. Examine all causes. Assume resistors not from same batch. Show how parameter change is cancelled out, use sum of squares statistics to show by how much. \ifthenelse {\boolean{paper}} { \begin{figure} \begin{tikzpicture}[line width=1pt] \draw (0,0) -- ++(0,1cm); \draw[decorate, decoration=cell] (0,1cm) -- ++(0,1.5cm); \draw (0,2.5cm) |- ++(1cm,1cm); \draw[decorate, decoration=diode] (1cm,3.5cm) -- ++(1.5cm,0); \draw (2.5cm,3.5cm) -- ++(2,0); \draw (3.5cm,3.5cm) -- ++(0,-1); \draw[decorate, decoration=switch] (3.5cm,2.5cm) -- ++(0,-1.5cm); \draw[decorate, decoration={inductor,amplitude=0.35cm, segment length=0.75cm}] (4.5cm,3.5cm) -- ++(1.5cm,0); \draw (6cm,3.5cm) -- ++(1,0); \draw (7cm,3.5cm) -- ++(3,0); \draw (8cm,3.5cm) -- ++(0,-1); \draw[decorate, decoration=capacitor] (8cm,2.5cm) -- ++(0,-1.5cm); \draw (0cm,0cm) -| ++(8cm,1cm); \draw (3.5cm,0cm) -- ++(0cm,1cm); \draw (10cm,3.5cm) -- ++(0,-1); \draw[decorate, decoration=recresistor] (10cm,2.5cm) -- ++(0,-1.5cm); %\draw[decorate, decoration=recresistor] (2.5cm,10cm) -- ++(0,-1.5cm); \draw (8cm,0cm) -| ++(2cm,1cm); \draw[decorate, decoration=ground] (5,0cm) -- ++(0,-1.5cm); \end{tikzpicture} \caption{a circuit} \end{figure} \begin{figure} \begin{tikzpicture}[line width=1pt] \draw (0,0) -- ++(1cm,1cm); \draw[decorate, decoration=recresistor] (1cm,2cm) -- ++(0,-1.5cm); \draw[decorate, decoration=recresistor] (2cm,2cm) -- ++(0,-1.5cm); \draw[decorate, decoration=recresistor] (1cm,4cm) -- ++(0,-1.5cm); \draw[decorate, decoration=recresistor] (2cm,4cm) -- ++(0,-1.5cm); %\draw[decorate, decoration=recresistor] (2.5cm,10cm) -- ++(0,-1.5cm); \draw (8cm,0cm) -| ++(2cm,1cm); \draw[decorate, decoration=ground] (5,0cm) -- ++(0,-1.5cm); \end{tikzpicture} \caption{A `network resistor'} \end{figure} } { electComp not in main thesis director yet }