{ \section{Introduction} This chapter describes a process for taking a functional group of components, applying FMEA analysis on all the component failure modes possible in that functional~group, and then determining how that functional group can fail. % % With this information, we can treat the functional group as a component in its own right. This new component is a derived from the functional~group. In the field of safety engineering this derived component correspond to a low~level sub-system. %The technique uses a graphical notation, based on Euler\cite{eulerviz} and Constraint diagrams\cite{constraint} to model failure modes and failure mode common symptom collection. The technique is designed for making building blocks for a hierarchical fault model. % Once the failure modes have been determined for a sub-system/derived~component, this derived component can be combined with others to form functional groups to model higher level sub-systems/derived~components. % In this way a hierarchy to represent the fault behaviour of a system can be built from the bottom~up. This process can continue until there is a complete hierarchy representing the failure mode behaviour of the entire system under analysis. %FMMD hierarchy Using the FMMD technique the hierarchy is built from the bottom up to ensure complete failure mode coverage. Because the process is bottom-up, syntax checking and tracking can ensure that no component failure mode can be overlooked. Once a hierarchy is in place it can be converted into a fault data model. % From the fault data model, automatic generation of FTA\cite{nasafta} (Fault Tree Analysis) and mimimal cuts sets\cite{nucfta} are possible. Also statistical reliability/probability of failure~on~demand\cite{en61508} and MTTF (Mean Time to Failure) calculations can be produced automatically, where component failure mode statistics are available\cite{mil1991}. % This chapter focuses on the process of building the blocks, the symptom extraction or abstraction process, that is key to creating an FMMD hierarchy. }