Friday work....
This commit is contained in:
parent
33766a8fdc
commit
fda862cb60
@ -19,12 +19,12 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{F.M.E.A.}
|
\section{F.M.E.A.}
|
||||||
\begin{frame}
|
\begin{frame}
|
||||||
\frametitle{Outline}
|
\frametitle{FMEA}
|
||||||
\tableofcontents[currentsection]
|
%\tableofcontents[currentsection]
|
||||||
\end{frame}
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{frame}
|
\begin{frame}
|
||||||
|
\frametitle{FMEA}
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
\pause \item Failure
|
\pause \item Failure
|
||||||
\pause \item Mode
|
\pause \item Mode
|
||||||
@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ will return most cost benefit.
|
|||||||
\label{fig:f16missile}
|
\label{fig:f16missile}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
Emphasis on determining criticality of failure.
|
Emphasis on determining criticality of failure.
|
||||||
Applies some Bayesian statistics (probabilities of component failures and those causing given system level failures).
|
Applies some Bayesian statistics (probabilities of component failures and those thereby causing given system level failures).
|
||||||
\end{frame}
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -340,13 +340,13 @@ The second probability factor $\beta$, is the probability that the failure mode
|
|||||||
will cause a given system failure.
|
will cause a given system failure.
|
||||||
This corresponds to `Bayesian' probability, given a particular
|
This corresponds to `Bayesian' probability, given a particular
|
||||||
component failure mode, the probability of a given system level failure.
|
component failure mode, the probability of a given system level failure.
|
||||||
|
\pause
|
||||||
\textbf{FMECA `t' Value}
|
\textbf{FMECA `t' Value}
|
||||||
The time that a system will be operating for, or the working life time of the product is
|
The time that a system will be operating for, or the working life time of the product is
|
||||||
represented by the variable $t$.
|
represented by the variable $t$.
|
||||||
%for probability of failure on demand studies,
|
%for probability of failure on demand studies,
|
||||||
%this can be the number of operating cycles or demands expected.
|
%this can be the number of operating cycles or demands expected.
|
||||||
|
\pause
|
||||||
\textbf{Severity `s' value}
|
\textbf{Severity `s' value}
|
||||||
A weighting factor to indicate the seriousness of the putative system level error.
|
A weighting factor to indicate the seriousness of the putative system level error.
|
||||||
%Typical classifications are as follows:~\cite{fmd91}
|
%Typical classifications are as follows:~\cite{fmd91}
|
||||||
@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ A weighting factor to indicate the seriousness of the putative system level erro
|
|||||||
\begin{equation}
|
\begin{equation}
|
||||||
C_m = {\beta} . {\alpha} . {{\lambda}_p} . {t} . {s}
|
C_m = {\beta} . {\alpha} . {{\lambda}_p} . {t} . {s}
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
\pause
|
||||||
Highest $C_m$ values would be at the top of a `to~do' list
|
Highest $C_m$ values would be at the top of a `to~do' list
|
||||||
for a project manager.
|
for a project manager.
|
||||||
\end{frame}
|
\end{frame}
|
||||||
@ -533,10 +533,12 @@ judged to be in critical sections of the product.
|
|||||||
\frametitle{FMEA - General Criticism}
|
\frametitle{FMEA - General Criticism}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\pause \item FMEA type methodologies were designed for simple electro-mechanical systems of the 1940's to 1960's.
|
||||||
\pause \item Reasoning Distance - component failure to system level symptom
|
\pause \item Reasoning Distance - component failure to system level symptom
|
||||||
\pause \item State explosion - impossible to perform rigorously
|
\pause \item State explosion - impossible to perform rigorously
|
||||||
\pause \item Difficult to re-use previous analysis work
|
\pause \item Difficult to re-use previous analysis work
|
||||||
\pause \item FMEA type methodologies were designed for simple electro-mechanical systems of the 1940's to 1960's.
|
\pause \item Very Difficult to model simultaneous failures.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
@ -555,6 +557,7 @@ judged to be in critical sections of the product.
|
|||||||
\pause \item Rigorous (total coverage)
|
\pause \item Rigorous (total coverage)
|
||||||
\pause \item Reasoning Traceable
|
\pause \item Reasoning Traceable
|
||||||
\pause \item Re-useable
|
\pause \item Re-useable
|
||||||
|
\pause \item Simultaneous failures
|
||||||
%\pause \item
|
%\pause \item
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user