another weakness of FMEDA identified
This commit is contained in:
parent
3250be53e3
commit
fa0723a16f
@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ safety, as it can miss unexpected effects due to `unexpected' component interact
|
||||
|
||||
The Statistical Analysis methodology is the core philosophy
|
||||
of the Safety Integrity Levels (SIL) embodied in EN61508 \cite{en61508}
|
||||
and its international analog standard IOC5108.
|
||||
and its international analog is standard IOC5108.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -669,6 +669,7 @@ and its international analog standard IOC5108.
|
||||
\item No possibility to model base component level double failure modes.
|
||||
\item As with all failure mode methodologies based on FMEA, does not model component failure modes
|
||||
that may cause more than one type of SYSTEM failure.
|
||||
\item Because FMEDA is based on one entry per component failure mode, top level symptoms are not grouped, and will be listed in a fragmented way, and may not have the same description.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
%AND then how we can solve all there problems
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user