FINAL because I am going down the pub
This commit is contained in:
parent
1b4aecc211
commit
f45896b222
@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ failure mode of the component or sub-system}}}
|
|||||||
% numbers at outer edges
|
% numbers at outer edges
|
||||||
\pagenumbering{arabic} % Arabic page numbers hereafter
|
\pagenumbering{arabic} % Arabic page numbers hereafter
|
||||||
\author{R.Clark$^\star$ , A.~Fish$^\dagger$ , C.~Garrett$^\dagger$, J.~Howse$^\dagger$ \\
|
\author{R.Clark$^\star$ , A.~Fish$^\dagger$ , C.~Garrett$^\dagger$, J.~Howse$^\dagger$ \\
|
||||||
$^\star${\em Energy Technology Control, 25 North Street, Lewes, BN7 2PE, UK} \and $^\dagger${\em University of Brighton, UK}
|
$^\star${\em Energy Technology Control, UK. r.clark@energytechnologycontrol.com} \and $^\dagger${\em University of Brighton, UK}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%\title{Developing a rigorous bottom-up modular static failure mode modelling methodology}
|
%\title{Developing a rigorous bottom-up modular static failure mode modelling methodology}
|
||||||
@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ If $E$ is the number of environmental conditions to consider
|
|||||||
in a system, and $A$ the number of applied/operational states (or modes of the system),
|
in a system, and $A$ the number of applied/operational states (or modes of the system),
|
||||||
the bottom-up analyst is presented with two
|
the bottom-up analyst is presented with two
|
||||||
additional %cross product
|
additional %cross product
|
||||||
factors,
|
factors, yielding approximately
|
||||||
$(N-1) \times N \times K \times E \times A$.
|
$(N-1) \times N \times K \times E \times A$.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
If we put some typical very small embedded system numbers\footnote{These figures would
|
If we put some typical very small embedded system numbers\footnote{These figures would
|
||||||
@ -364,12 +364,12 @@ that interact to provide
|
|||||||
a function or task within a system.
|
a function or task within a system.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
In the proposed methodology components are collected into functional groups
|
In the proposed methodology components are collected into functional groups
|
||||||
and each component failure (and optionally combinations) are considered in the
|
and each component failure (and possibly multiple simultaneous component failures) are considered in the
|
||||||
context of the {\fg}.
|
context of the {\fg}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%% GARK
|
%% GARK
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
The component failures (and optional combinations) are termed {\em{\fcs}}. %`test~cases'.
|
The component failures are termed {\em{\fcs}}. %`test~cases'.
|
||||||
For each {\fc}
|
For each {\fc}
|
||||||
there will be a corresponding resultant failure, or `symptom', from the perspective of the {\fg}.
|
there will be a corresponding resultant failure, or `symptom', from the perspective of the {\fg}.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
@ -1269,7 +1269,12 @@ Furthermore the reasoning path is traceable. By being able to trace a
|
|||||||
top level event down through derived components, to base component
|
top level event down through derived components, to base component
|
||||||
failure modes, with each step annotated as {\fcs}, the model is easier to maintain.
|
failure modes, with each step annotated as {\fcs}, the model is easier to maintain.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\paragraph{Future work}
|
||||||
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
|
\item To provide bounds on the size of the state space for the application of the methodology to certain classes of systems.
|
||||||
|
\item To build a {\dcs} library of common electrical, mechanical and software models (i.e. a collection of worked example {\dcs}).
|
||||||
|
\item To provide formal generic translations from the constructed model of any given system to the other models.
|
||||||
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
%\today
|
%\today
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
{ %\tiny %\footnotesize
|
{ %\tiny %\footnotesize
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user