Morning edit: tidying determining component
failure modes description.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9faeab90da
commit
f0e4498c3f
@ -103,15 +103,19 @@ allowing re-use of modules and reducing the number of by-hand analysis checks to
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{A detailed look at failure symptoms of two components: the op-amp and the resistor}
|
||||
\subsection{Determining the failure modes of components}
|
||||
|
||||
In order to apply any form of Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA) we need to know the ways in which the components we are using can fail.
|
||||
Typically when choosing components for a design, we look at manufacturers data sheets,
|
||||
which describe the range and tolerances, and can indicate how a component may fail/behave
|
||||
under certain conditions or environments.
|
||||
How base components could fail internally, its not of interest to an FMEA investigation.
|
||||
The FMEA investigator needs to know what failure behaviour a component may exhibit, or in other words, its
|
||||
modes of failure.
|
||||
|
||||
A large body of literature exists which gives guidance for for determining component {\fms}.
|
||||
For this study FMD-91~\cite{fmd91} and the gas burner standard EN298~\cite{en298}.
|
||||
%
|
||||
For this study FMD-91~\cite{fmd91} and the gas burner standard EN298~\cite{en298} are examined.
|
||||
%Some standards prescribe specific failure modes for generic component types.
|
||||
In EN298 failure modes for generic component types are prescribed, or
|
||||
determined by a procedure where failure scenarios of all pins OPEN and all adjacent pins shorted
|
||||
@ -122,7 +126,7 @@ FMD-91 is a reference document released into the public domain by the United Sta
|
||||
and describes {\fms} of common electronic components.
|
||||
FMD-91 entries include descriptions of internal failures along with {\fms}.
|
||||
FMD-91 entries need, in some cases, some interpretation to be mapped to a clear set of
|
||||
component failure modes.
|
||||
component {\fms} suitable for use in FMEA.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
% One is from the US military document FMD-91, where internal failures
|
||||
@ -141,8 +145,8 @@ component failure modes.
|
||||
% I hope to have chapter 5 finished by the end of March, chapter 5 being the
|
||||
% electronics examples for the FMMD methodology.
|
||||
|
||||
We look in detail at two common electrical components in this section and examine how
|
||||
two sources of information on failure modes view their failure mode behaviour.
|
||||
In this section we look in detail at two common electrical components and examine how
|
||||
the two sources of information define their failure mode behaviour.
|
||||
We look at the reasons why some known failure modes are omitted, or presented in
|
||||
specific but unintuitive ways.
|
||||
%We compare the US. military published failure mode specifications wi
|
||||
@ -150,16 +154,17 @@ specific but unintuitive ways.
|
||||
We then compare and contrast the failure modes determined for these components
|
||||
from the FMD-91 reference source and from the guidelines of the
|
||||
European burner standard EN298.
|
||||
\subsection{Failure mode determination for generic resistor}
|
||||
|
||||
%- Failure modes. Prescribed failure modes EN298 - FMD91
|
||||
\subsubsection{Resistor failure modes according to FMD-91}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{resistor}
|
||||
|
||||
The resistor is a ubiquitous component in electronics, and is there fore a good
|
||||
example for examining it failure modes.
|
||||
The resistor is a ubiquitous component in electronics, and is therefore a prime
|
||||
example for examining its failure modes.
|
||||
FMD-91\cite{fmd91}[3-178] lists many types of resistor
|
||||
and lists many possible failure causes.
|
||||
For instance for {\textbf Resistor,~Fixed,~Film} we are given the following failure causes:
|
||||
For instance for {\textbf{Resistor,~Fixed,~Film}} we are given the following failure causes:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Opened 52\%
|
||||
\item Drift 31.8\%
|
||||
@ -172,7 +177,7 @@ This information may be of insterest to the manufacturer of resistors, but it do
|
||||
help a circuit designer.
|
||||
The circuit designer is not interested in the causes of resistor failure, but to build in contingecy
|
||||
against symptoms of failure that the resistor could exhibit.
|
||||
We can determine these symptoms and map these failure causes to three symptoms,
|
||||
We can determine these {\fms} and map these failure causes to three symptoms,
|
||||
drift (resistance value changing), open and short.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
@ -189,6 +194,8 @@ modes do not include drift.
|
||||
If we can ensure that our resistors will not be exposed to overload conditions, drift or parameter change
|
||||
can be reasonably excluded.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Resistor failure modes according to EN298}
|
||||
|
||||
EN298 ,the European gas burner safety standard,tends to be give more symptom centric failure modes than FMD-91,
|
||||
and requires that a full FMEA be undertaken, examining all characterisic failure modes
|
||||
of all components~\cite{en298}[11.2 5].
|
||||
@ -226,15 +233,24 @@ i.e.
|
||||
|
||||
$$ fm(R) = \{ OPEN, SHORT \} . $$
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{op-amp}
|
||||
\subsection{Failure modes determination for generic OP-AMP}
|
||||
|
||||
The op-amp is a differential amplifier and is very widely used.
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h+]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=200pt]{./lm258pinout.jpg}
|
||||
% lm258pinout.jpg: 478x348 pixel, 96dpi, 12.65x9.21 cm, bb=0 0 359 261
|
||||
\caption{Pinout for an LM358 dual OP-AMP}
|
||||
\label{fig:lm258}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
The op-amp is a differential amplifier and is very widely used in nearly all fields of modern electronics.
|
||||
They are typically packaged in dual or quad configurations---meaning
|
||||
that a chip will typically contain two or four amplifiers.
|
||||
For the purpose of example, we look at
|
||||
a typical op-amp designed for instrumentation and measurement, the dual packaged version of the LM358~\cite{lm358}.
|
||||
a typical op-amp designed for instrumentation and measurement, the dual packaged version of the LM358~\cite{lm358}
|
||||
(see figure~\ref{fig:lm258}).
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{FMD-91 Op-AMP Failure Modes}
|
||||
\subsubsection{ Failure Modes of an OP-AMP according to FMD-91 }
|
||||
|
||||
%Literature suggests, latch up, latch down and oscillation.
|
||||
For OP-AMP failures modes, FMD-91\cite{fmd91}{3-116] states,
|
||||
@ -244,10 +260,10 @@ For OP-AMP failures modes, FMD-91\cite{fmd91}{3-116] states,
|
||||
\item Opened $V_+$ open\%
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
These are internal causes of failure, more of interest to the component manufacter
|
||||
Again these are mostly internal causes of failure, more of interest to the component manufacturer
|
||||
than a designer looking for the symptoms of failure.
|
||||
We need to translate these failure causes within the OP-AMP into symptoms.
|
||||
We can look at each failure cause in turn.
|
||||
We need to translate these failure causes within the OP-AMP into {\fms}.
|
||||
We can look at each failure cause in turn, and map it to potential {\fms}.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{OP-AMP failure cause: Poor Die attach}
|
||||
The symptom for this is given as a low slew rate. This means that the op-amp
|
||||
@ -255,12 +271,12 @@ will not react quickly to changes on its input terminals.
|
||||
This is a failure symptom that may not be of concern in a slow responding system like an
|
||||
instrumentation amplifier. However, where higher frequencies are being processed
|
||||
a signal may be lost.
|
||||
We can map this failure cause to a failure symptom, and we can call it $LOW_{slew}$.
|
||||
We can map this failure cause to a {\fm}, and we can call it $LOW_{slew}$.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{No Operation - over stress}
|
||||
Here the OP\_AMP has been damaged, and the output may be held HIGH LOW, or may be effectively tri-stated
|
||||
, i.e. not able to drive circuitry in along the next stages of te signal path: we can call theis state NOOP (no Operation).
|
||||
|
||||
, i.e. not able to drive circuitry in along the next stages of the signal path: we can call this state NOOP (no Operation).
|
||||
%
|
||||
We can map this failure cause to three symptoms, $LOW$, $HIGH$, $NOOP$.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Shorted $V_+$ to $V_-$}
|
||||
@ -273,10 +289,11 @@ This failure cause will mean that the minus input will have the very high gain
|
||||
of the OP-AMP applied to it, and the output will be forced HIGH or LOW.
|
||||
We map this failure cause to $HIGH$ or $LOW$.
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Collecting failure symptoms from FMD-91}
|
||||
We can define an OP-AMP, under FMD-91 definitions to have the following failure mode symptoms.
|
||||
\paragraph{Collecting OP-AMP failure modes from FMD-91}
|
||||
We can define an OP-AMP, under FMD-91 definitions to have the following {\fms}.
|
||||
$$fm(OP-AMP) = \{ HIGH, LOW, NOOP, LOW_{slew} \} $$
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Failure Modes of an OP-AMP according to EN298}
|
||||
|
||||
EN298 does not specifically define OP\_AMPS failure modes; these can be determined
|
||||
by following a procedure for `integrated~circuits' outlined in
|
||||
@ -286,13 +303,6 @@ We can examine these failure modes by taking a typical instrumentation op-amp, s
|
||||
and examining
|
||||
these conditions.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=200pt]{./lm258pinout.jpg}
|
||||
% lm258pinout.jpg: 478x348 pixel, 96dpi, 12.65x9.21 cm, bb=0 0 359 261
|
||||
\caption{Pinout for an LM358 dual OP-AMP}
|
||||
\label{fig:lm258}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user