JMC proof read
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a2b15345d
commit
e797ce5082
@ -481,6 +481,7 @@ defined by $ G_v = 1 + \frac{R2}{R1} $ at the output.
|
|||||||
As the resistors work to provide a specific function, that of a potential divider,
|
As the resistors work to provide a specific function, that of a potential divider,
|
||||||
we can treat them as a collection of components with a specific functionality---which can be termed a `{\fg}'.
|
we can treat them as a collection of components with a specific functionality---which can be termed a `{\fg}'.
|
||||||
This {\fg} has two members, $R1$ and $R2$.
|
This {\fg} has two members, $R1$ and $R2$.
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
Using the EN298 specification for resistor failure~\cite{en298}[App.A],
|
Using the EN298 specification for resistor failure~\cite{en298}[App.A],
|
||||||
we can assign failure modes of $OPEN$ and $SHORT$ to the resistors individually (assignment of failure modes
|
we can assign failure modes of $OPEN$ and $SHORT$ to the resistors individually (assignment of failure modes
|
||||||
is discussed in more detail in section~\ref{sec:resistorfm}).
|
is discussed in more detail in section~\ref{sec:resistorfm}).
|
||||||
@ -502,7 +503,7 @@ We represent a resistor and its failure modes as a directed acyclic graph (DAG)
|
|||||||
\path (R) edge (RSHORT);
|
\path (R) edge (RSHORT);
|
||||||
\path (R) edge (ROPEN);
|
\path (R) edge (ROPEN);
|
||||||
\end{tikzpicture}
|
\end{tikzpicture}
|
||||||
\caption{DAG representing a resistor and its failure modes}
|
\caption{DAG representing a resistor and its failure modes.}
|
||||||
\label{fig:rdag}
|
\label{fig:rdag}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -998,7 +999,7 @@ Failure Scenario & A single failure mode (or a combination), used to
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Parts, Components and Base Components.}
|
\subsection{Parts, Components and Base Components.}
|
||||||
A component is anything we use to build %a product or
|
A component is anything we use to build a %a product or
|
||||||
system.
|
system.
|
||||||
It could be something %quite complicated
|
It could be something %quite complicated
|
||||||
like an %integrated
|
like an %integrated
|
||||||
@ -1023,7 +1024,7 @@ and say that we want to define an atomic entity. % used as a building block.
|
|||||||
%The term component, in American English, can mean a building block or a part.
|
%The term component, in American English, can mean a building block or a part.
|
||||||
%In British-English a component generally is given to mean the definition for part above.
|
%In British-English a component generally is given to mean the definition for part above.
|
||||||
We define {\bc} to be the lowest level---or entities we begin with in our analysis---of component that we use as a building block.
|
We define {\bc} to be the lowest level---or entities we begin with in our analysis---of component that we use as a building block.
|
||||||
This is a choice made by the analyst, often guided by the standards to which the analysis is being performed to.
|
This is a choice made by the analyst, often guided by the standards to which the analysis is being performed. % to.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
Both op-amps and transistors have published statistical failure rates and yet an op-amp is constructed from transistors.
|
Both op-amps and transistors have published statistical failure rates and yet an op-amp is constructed from transistors.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
@ -1041,7 +1042,7 @@ to which we are approving/analysing a system.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
%% FUCKING STEREO SUB_SYSTEM EXAMPLE, THE FUCKING CHILDRENS SECTION
|
%% FUCKING STEREO SUB_SYSTEM EXAMPLE, THE FUCKING CHILDRENS SECTION
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{definition of terms: sound system example.}
|
\subsection{Definition of terms: sound system example.}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%000000elpful here to define the terms, `system', `functional~group', `component', `base~component', `symptom' and `derived~component/sub-system'.
|
%000000elpful here to define the terms, `system', `functional~group', `component', `base~component', `symptom' and `derived~component/sub-system'.
|
||||||
%These are listed in table~\ref{tab:symexdef}.
|
%These are listed in table~\ref{tab:symexdef}.
|
||||||
@ -1125,7 +1126,7 @@ the symptoms of failure of the {\fg} are the failure modes of this new `{\dc}'.
|
|||||||
Electrical components have data-sheets associated with them. The data sheets
|
Electrical components have data-sheets associated with them. The data sheets
|
||||||
supply detailed information on the component as supplied by the manufacturer.
|
supply detailed information on the component as supplied by the manufacturer.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
Because they are design related they rarely rarely show %clearly detail the
|
Because they are design related they rarely show %clearly detail the
|
||||||
failure modes of the component, with environmental factors and MTTF~\cite{sccs}[p.165] statistics.
|
failure modes of the component, with environmental factors and MTTF~\cite{sccs}[p.165] statistics.
|
||||||
Given the growing usage of FMEA/FMEDA in industry this may change.
|
Given the growing usage of FMEA/FMEDA in industry this may change.
|
||||||
Currently, failure mode information is generally only available for generic component types~\cite{mil1991, fmd91}.
|
Currently, failure mode information is generally only available for generic component types~\cite{mil1991, fmd91}.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user