fta or trap described as a example
This commit is contained in:
parent
51d46d452c
commit
e6f66dfe3b
@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ to assist in building models for FTA, FMEA, FMECA and FMEDA failure mode analysi
|
|||||||
%\node[annot,right of=s](dcl) {Derived Component};
|
%\node[annot,right of=s](dcl) {Derived Component};
|
||||||
\end{tikzpicture}
|
\end{tikzpicture}
|
||||||
% End of code
|
% End of code
|
||||||
\caption{DAG representing failure modes and symptoms of the Non Inverting Op-amp Circuit}
|
\caption{Full DAG representing failure modes and symptoms of the Non Inverting Op-amp Circuit}
|
||||||
\label{fig:noninvdag0}
|
\label{fig:noninvdag0}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ to assist in building models for FTA, FMEA, FMECA and FMEDA failure mode analysi
|
|||||||
\section{Extracting Fault Trees from the DAG}
|
\section{Extracting Fault Trees from the DAG}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We can derive an FTA~\cite{nucfta}~\cite{nasafta} diagram for a top level event, by tracing back through the DAG.
|
We can derive an FTA~\cite{nucfta}~\cite{nasafta} diagram for a top level event, by tracing back through the DAG.
|
||||||
Where we come to a node with more than one error source, this becomes an or gate
|
Where we come to a node with more than one error source, this becomes an `xor' gate
|
||||||
in the FTA diagram. Tracing back from the top level event $AMP Low$ we are lead to
|
in the FTA diagram. Tracing back from the top level event $AMP Low$ we are lead to
|
||||||
the $OPAMP latch down$ and $OP amp Noop$. These two events can cause the symptom $AMP Low$.
|
the $OPAMP latch down$ and $OP amp Noop$. These two events can cause the symptom $AMP Low$.
|
||||||
We can also trace back down to the symptom $PD High$. Thus we have three
|
We can also trace back down to the symptom $PD High$. Thus we have three
|
||||||
@ -827,7 +827,23 @@ The FTA diagram directly derived from the FMMD DAG is shown in figure \ref{fig:n
|
|||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\subsection{The FTA `or' trap}
|
||||||
|
The example above highlighs a weakness in the FTA methodology.
|
||||||
|
Intuitively, the $AMP_{low}$ failure symptom, has three possible
|
||||||
|
causes and it would be tempting drawing an FTA diagram
|
||||||
|
to use a triple input `or' gate to model these.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
An `or' gate would mean that the powerset of all its inputs
|
||||||
|
leads to the resultant failure mode/symptom.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In this case we have a combination that breaks this rule. Were the condition
|
||||||
|
$$PD_{high} \wedge OPAMP_{noop}$$ to be true we would have a floating output
|
||||||
|
which is a different error condition to the output being actively low.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This means that anyone drawing an OR gate in an FTA diagram
|
||||||
|
should either specifiy that only single failure modes are considered
|
||||||
|
possible, or, must consider all powerset combinations of the inputs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Information missing in FTA}
|
\subsection{Information missing in FTA}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user