Thermocouple comp
This commit is contained in:
parent
a5dc8ccf13
commit
dc5562d3c0
@ -569,4 +569,15 @@ DAH. The circuit is arguably safer now
|
|||||||
but statistically less reliable.
|
but statistically less reliable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\paragraph{Practical side effect of checking for thermocouple disconnection}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Because the potential divider provides an offset as a side effect of detecting a disconnection
|
||||||
|
resistance in the thermocopule extension or compensation cable will have an effect.
|
||||||
|
For a `k' type thermocouple this would be of the order of $5 { }^{o}C$ for $100\Omega$ of
|
||||||
|
cable loop impedance. Therefore, accuracy constraints and cable impedance should be considered
|
||||||
|
to determine specified maximum compensation/extension lengths.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user