Thermocouple comp
This commit is contained in:
parent
a5dc8ccf13
commit
dc5562d3c0
@ -569,4 +569,15 @@ DAH. The circuit is arguably safer now
|
||||
but statistically less reliable.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\paragraph{Practical side effect of checking for thermocouple disconnection}
|
||||
|
||||
Because the potential divider provides an offset as a side effect of detecting a disconnection
|
||||
resistance in the thermocopule extension or compensation cable will have an effect.
|
||||
For a `k' type thermocouple this would be of the order of $5 { }^{o}C$ for $100\Omega$ of
|
||||
cable loop impedance. Therefore, accuracy constraints and cable impedance should be considered
|
||||
to determine specified maximum compensation/extension lengths.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user