diff --git a/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex b/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex
index e27837c..48bea2b 100644
--- a/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex
+++ b/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ The second stage of this amplifier, following the signal path, is the amplifier
 consisting of $R3,R4$ and $IC2$.
 %
 This is in exactly the same configuration as the first amplifier, but it is being fed by the first amplifier.
-The first amplifier was connected to ground on its minus input 
+The first amplifier was connected to ground via a resistor on its minus input 
 and received as input `+V1' (explicitly
 a positive voltage from the schematic).
 This means the junction of R2 R3 is always +ve.
diff --git a/submission_thesis/CH8_Conclusion/copy.tex b/submission_thesis/CH8_Conclusion/copy.tex
index a2e9164..9c4259f 100644
--- a/submission_thesis/CH8_Conclusion/copy.tex
+++ b/submission_thesis/CH8_Conclusion/copy.tex
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ The FMECA and FMEDA variants also suffer from embedding subjective and objective
 A modularised FMEA---Failure Mode Modular De-composition (FMMD)---had been proposed.
 %
 This modularised version had been supported by the work already established by the definition of
-{\fms} for {\bc} in the literature~\cite{fmd91,mil1991,en298,en230}.
+{\fms} for {\bcs} in the literature~\cite{fmd91,mil1991,en298,en230}.
 %
 A selection of electronic examples was analysed using FMMD
 which deliberately introduced varying circuit