robin/Robin_PHD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

state exposion estimation

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Robin Clark 2011-09-18 11:16:14 +01:00
parent 768d2f3ef0
commit c91f974d89
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
fmmd_concept/System_safety_2011/state_exp.tex
View File

@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ $$
%\end{equation}
$$
Thud for FMMD we needed to examine 720 failure mode scenarios, and for traditional FMEA
Thus for FMMD we needed to examine 720 failure mode scenarios, and for traditional FMEA
type analysis methods 19440.
% In practical example followed through, no more than 9 components have ever been required for a functional
% group and the largest known number of failure modes has been 6.
@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ type analysis methods 19440.
\clearpage
Note that for double simultaneous failures the equation~\ref{eqn:fmea_state_exp} becomes
equation~\ref{eqn:fmea_state_exp2} essentially making the order $N^3$.
The FMMD case is cubic within the functional groups only, not all the components in the system.
The FMMD case (equation~\ref{eqn:anscen2}), is cubic within the functional groups only, not all the components in the system.
\begin{equation}
@ -132,6 +132,10 @@ The FMMD case is cubic within the functional groups only, not all the components
%(N^2 - N).cfm
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\label{eqn:anscen2}
\sum_{n=0}^{L} {fgn}^{n}.fgn.cfm.(fgn-1).(fgn-2)
\end{equation}
\end{document}