robin/Robin_PHD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

AHHHGGGGHHH hate this hate this

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Robin P. Clark 2013-09-23 10:01:15 +01:00
parent 50cf26c1ea
commit c8e05cb78f
2 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
submission_thesis/CH7_Evaluation/copy.tex
View File

@ -1440,7 +1440,7 @@ Their probabilities expressed as $P(B_4) = P(B_1 \cap B_3)$ and $P(B_5) = P(B_1
\section{Critiques} \section{Critiques}
\subsection{Problems in choosing membership of {\fgs}} \subsection{Problems in choosing membership of {\fgs}}
\label{subsec:choosingfgs}
The choice of components for {\fgs} is one to be made by the analyst. The choice of components for {\fgs} is one to be made by the analyst.
% %
The guiding principle it to choose components that are functionally adjacent The guiding principle it to choose components that are functionally adjacent

2
submission_thesis/CH8_Conclusion/copy.tex
View File

@ -207,6 +207,8 @@ structures of the FMMD hierarchy were used to analyse the same circuitry.
% %
The same system level failure modes were obtained, but the more de-composed examples The same system level failure modes were obtained, but the more de-composed examples
offered better performance in terms of comparison complexity. offered better performance in terms of comparison complexity.
%%
Potential problems of side effects and {\fg} membership choices are discussed in section~\ref{subsec:choosingfgs}.
% %
Further work may be required to apply justification for the choice of membership in {\fgs}. Further work may be required to apply justification for the choice of membership in {\fgs}.
% %