robin/Robin_PHD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

morning edit

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Robin Clark 2011-06-06 08:34:20 +01:00
parent dae940d02b
commit bbbf21383e
2 changed files with 141 additions and 66 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

205
invopamp/invopamp.tex
View File

@ -9,28 +9,32 @@ configuration %, with the opamp and gain resistors
using the FMMD
methodology.
%
It has five base components, four resistors %two resistors programming gain, two programming a reference, or virtual ground voltage
The circuit under analysis has five `base components', four resistors % two resistors programming gain, two programming a reference, or virtual ground voltage
and one op-amp.
%
Two resistors are used as a current balance/virtual ground to program the gain
of the amplifier, and another pair to set the reference or virtual ground voltage.
We consider two of the resistors as a functional group, a potential divider
where their function is to operate as a virtual ground voltage reference.
The gain resistors work with the op-amp to determine the gain characteristics.
of the amplifier and another pair to set the reference or virtual ground voltage.
We consider the resistors setting the reference voltage as a functional group, a potential divider. %.$PD$.
%where their function is to operate as a virtual ground voltage reference.
The gain resistors work with the op-amp to determine the gain characteristics, and therefore the two gain resistors and the op-amp
form a second functional group.% $GAMP$.
%
The base component error modes of the
components are used to model the amplifier from
a failure mode perspective.
The base component failure modes
are used to model each functional group %the amplifier from
from a failure mode perspective.
%
We determine the failure symptoms of the potential divider and
consider this as a derived component.
We determine the failure symptoms from each of these {\fgs} and
create {\dcs} to represent them.
We can have a {\dc} represetnting the potential~divider and another representing the gain stage.
We can now create a functional group representing the inverting amplifier,
by bringing the failure modes from the potential divider and
the op-amp with its gain programming resistors into a functional group.
by bringing the {\dcs} %
$PD$ and $GMAP$
together to form a higher level functional group .
%
This can be analysed and a derived component to represent the inverting
amplifier determined.
This can be analysed and a derived component, %$INVAMP$
created, to represent the failure mode behaviour of the inverting
amplifier.
}
\section{Introduction}
}
@ -40,28 +44,30 @@ configuration %, with the opamp and gain resistors
using the FMMD
methodology.
%
It has five base components, four resistors % two resistors programming gain, two programming a reference, or virtual ground voltage
The circuit under analysis has five 'base components', four resistors % two resistors programming gain, two programming a reference, or virtual ground voltage
and one op-amp.
%
Two resistors are used as a current balance/virtual ground to program the gain
of the amplifier, and another pair to set the reference or virtual ground voltage.
We consider two of the resistors as a functional group, a potential divider
where their function is to operate as a virtual ground voltage reference.
The gain resistors work with the op-amp to determine the gain characteristics.
of the amplifier and another pair to set the reference or virtual ground voltage.
We consider the resistors setting the reference voltage as a functional group, a potential divider $PD$.
This chapter re-uses the $PD$ derived component from \ref{lab:nonivopamp}.
%where their function is to operate as a virtual ground voltage reference.
The gain resistors work with the op-amp to determine the gain characteristics, and therefore the two gain resistors and the op-amp
form a second functional group $GAMP$.
%
The base component error modes of the
components are used to model the amplifier from
a failure mode perspective.
components are used to model each functional group %the amplifier from
from a failure mode perspective.
%
We determine the failure symptoms of the potential divider and
consider this as a derived component.
We determine the failure symptoms from each of these {\fgs} and
create {\dcs} to represent them.
We can now create a functional group representing the inverting amplifier,
by bringing the failure modes from the potential divider and
the op-amp with its gain programming resistors into a functional group.
by bringing the {\dcs} $PD$ and $GMAP$ together to form a higher level functional group .
%
This can be analysed and a derived component to represent the inverting
This can be analysed and a derived component, $INVAMP$ created, to represent the inverting
amplifier determined.
\section{Introduction: The non-inverting amplifier}
}
@ -80,18 +86,17 @@ A standard non inverting op amp (from ``The Art of Electronics'' ~\cite{aoe}[pp
The function of the resistors in this circuit is to set the amplifier gain.
They operate as a current balance/virtual ground and program the minus input on the op-amp
to balance them against the positive input, giving the voltage gain ($G_v$)
defined by $ G_v = 1 + \frac{R2}{R1} $ at the output.
The voltage gain of this circuit ($G_v$)
defined by $ G_v = -\frac{R4}{R3} $.
\section{Potential Divider - OP-AMP Virtual ground reference}
A functional group, is an ideally small in number collection of components,
that interact to provide
a function or task within a system.
As the resistors work to provide a specific function, that of a current balance/virtual ground,
As the resistors work to provide a specific function, that of a potential divider to program a given voltage,
we can treat them as a functional group. This functional group has two members, $R1$ and $R2$.
Using the EN298 specification for resistor failure ~\cite{en298}[App.A]
we can assign failure modes of $OPEN$ and $SHORT$ to the resistors.
@ -120,7 +125,7 @@ We can now represent a resistor in terms of its failure modes as a directed acyc
}
{
}
Thus $R1$ has failure modes $\{R1\_OPEN, R1\_SHORT\}$ and $R2$ has failure modes $\{R2\_OPEN, R2\_SHORT\}$.
Thus for the potential~divider stage $R1$ has failure modes $\{R1\_OPEN, R1\_SHORT\}$ and $R2$ has failure modes $\{R2\_OPEN, R2\_SHORT\}$.
%\clearpage
@ -130,14 +135,14 @@ Thus $R1$ has failure modes $\{R1\_OPEN, R1\_SHORT\}$ and $R2$ has failure modes
{
Modelling this as a functional group, we can draw a simple closed curve
to represent each failure mode, taken from the components R1 and R2,
in the current balance/virtual ground, shown in figure \ref{fig:fg1}.
% \begin{figure}[h]
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=200pt,keepaspectratio=true]{./invopamp/fg1.png}
% % fg1.jpg: 430x271 pixel, 72dpi, 15.17x9.56 cm, bb=0 0 430 271
% \caption{current balance/virtual ground `functional group' failure modes}
% \label{fig:fg1}
% \end{figure}
in the potential divider, shown in figure \ref{fig:fg1}.
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=200pt,keepaspectratio=true]{./invopamp/fg1.png}
% fg1.jpg: 430x271 pixel, 72dpi, 15.17x9.56 cm, bb=0 0 430 271
\caption{potential divider failure modes}
\label{fig:fg1}
\end{figure}
}
{
}
@ -146,7 +151,7 @@ in the current balance/virtual ground, shown in figure \ref{fig:fg1}.
{
Modelling this as a functional group, we can draw this as a directed graph
failure modes, taken from the components R1 and R2,
in the current balance/virtual ground, shown in figure \ref{fig:fg1dag}.
in the potential divider, shown in figure \ref{fig:fg1dag}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\begin{tikzpicture}[shorten >=1pt,->,draw=black!50, node distance=\layersep]
@ -193,7 +198,7 @@ in the current balance/virtual ground, shown in figure \ref{fig:fg1dag}.
}
We can now look at each of these base component failure modes,
and determine how they will affect the operation of the current balance/virtual ground.
and determine how they will affect the operation of the potential divider.
%Each failure mode scenario we look at will be given a test case number,
%which is represented on the diagram, with an asterisk marking
%which failure modes is modelling (see figure \ref{fig:fg1a}).
@ -204,13 +209,13 @@ Each labelled asterisk in the diagram represents a failure mode scenario.
The failure mode scenarios are given test case numbers, and an example to clarify this follows
in table~\ref{pdfmea}.
% \begin{figure}[h+]
% \centering
% \includegraphics[width=200pt,keepaspectratio=true]{./invopamp/fg1a.png}
% % fg1a.jpg: 430x271 pixel, 72dpi, 15.17x9.56 cm, bb=0 0 430 271
% \caption{current balance/virtual ground with test cases}
% \label{fig:fg1a}
% \end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h+]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=200pt,keepaspectratio=true]{./invopamp/fg1a.png}
% fg1a.jpg: 430x271 pixel, 72dpi, 15.17x9.56 cm, bb=0 0 430 271
\caption{potential divider with test cases}
\label{fig:fg1a}
\end{figure}
}
{
}
@ -222,10 +227,10 @@ For this example we can look at single failure modes only.
For each failure mode in our {\fg} `potential~divider'
we can assign a test case number (see table \ref{pdfmea}).
Each test case is analysed to determine the `symptom'
on the current balance/virtual grounds' operation. For instance
on the potential diverders operation. For instance
were the resistor $R_1$ to go open, the circuit would not be grounded and the
voltage output from it would be the +ve supply rail.
This would mean the symptom of the failed current balance/virtual ground, would be that it
This would mean the symptom of the failed potential divider, would be that it
gives an output high voltage reading. We can now consider the {\fg}
as a component in its own right, and its symptoms as its failure modes.
@ -371,17 +376,61 @@ as a building block for other {\fgs} in the same way as we used the resistors $R
\clearpage
\section{Failure Mode Analysis of the OP-AMP}
\section{Failure Mode Analysis of the OP-AMP Gain Section}
Let use now consider the op-amp. According to
FMD-91~\cite{fmd91}[3-116] an op amp may have the following failure modes:
latchup(12.5\%), latchdown(6\%), nooperation(31.3\%), lowslewrate(50\%).
The op-amp gain section use resistors $R4$ and $R3$ to determine the amount of negative gain.
Each of the reistors have two failure modes $SHORT$ and $OPEN$.
For our gain stage amplifier section, we have a {\fg} comprising
the opamp, R3 and R4.
\paragraph{Functional group context}
We have to consider the context the amplifier is used it to determine its failure mode symptoms.
If this were to be a instrumentaion amplifier, the low slew failure mode may not be a problem at all
but could affect an audio amplifier by introducing low-pass filtering.
TC2, TC1 and TC7, where there is no gain or ref voltage is output, could be very bad for an instrumentation amplifier
because the oputput may be in a valid reading range for the application.
For the purpose of example we shall consider this amplifier to be an instumentation
amplifier.
\begin{table}[ht]
\caption{Inverting Amplifier Gain Stage: Failure Mode Effects Analysis: Single Faults} % title of Table
\centering % used for centering table
\begin{tabular}{||l|c|c|l|l||}
\hline \hline
\textbf{Test} & \textbf{Amplifier} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{General} \\
\textbf{Case} & \textbf{Effect} & \textbf{ } & \textbf{Symtom Description} \\
% R & wire & res + & res - & description
\hline
\hline
TC1: $R3_{OPEN}$ & Ref V. Output & & \\
TC2: $R3_{SHORT}$ & High Gain & & OUT\_OF\_RANGE \\ \hline
TC3: $R4_{OPEN}$ & High Gain & & OUT\_OF\_RANGE \\
TC4: $R4_{SHORT}$ & No Gain & & \\ \hline
TC5: $OPAMP$ LatchUP & High Output +Ve & & OUT\_OF\_RANGE \\
TC6: $OPAMP$ LatchDown & Low Output -Ve & & OUT\_OF\_RANGE \\ \hline
TC7: $OPAMP$ No Operation & Low Output -Ve & & OUT\_OF\_RANGE \\
TC8: $OPAMP$ Low Slew & Low pass filter & & \\ \hline
%TC7: $R_2$ OPEN & LOW & & LowPD \\ \hline
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{ampfmea}
\end{table}
\ifthenelse {\boolean{pld}}
{
We can represent these failure modes on a diagram (see figure~\ref{fig:op1}).
We can represent these failure modes of this {\fg} on a diagram (see figure~\ref{fig:op1}).
\begin{figure}[h+]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=200pt,keepaspectratio=true]{./invopamp/op1.png}
@ -395,7 +444,7 @@ We can represent these failure modes on a diagram (see figure~\ref{fig:op1}).
\ifthenelse {\boolean{dag}}
{
We can represent these failure modes on a DAG (see figure~\ref{fig:op1dag}).
We can represent the failure modes of this {\fg} on a DAG (see figure~\ref{fig:op1dag}).
\begin{figure}
\centering
\begin{tikzpicture}[shorten >=1pt,->,draw=black!50, node distance=\layersep]
@ -413,11 +462,30 @@ We can represent these failure modes on a DAG (see figure~\ref{fig:op1dag}).
\node[failure] (OPAMPNP) at (\layersep,-4) {noop};
\node[failure] (OPAMPLS) at (\layersep,-6) {lowslew};
\path (OPAMP) edge (OPAMPLU);
\path (OPAMP) edge (OPAMPLD);
\path (OPAMP) edge (OPAMPNP);
\path (OPAMP) edge (OPAMPLS);
\node[component] (R3) at (0,-9) {$R3$};
\node[failure] (R3SHORT) at (\layersep,-8) {SHORT};
\node[failure] (R3OPEN) at (\layersep,-10) {OPEN};
\path (R3) edge (R3SHORT);
\path (R3) edge (R3OPEN);
\node[component] (R4) at (0,-14) {$R4$};
\node[failure] (R4SHORT) at (\layersep,-13) {SHORT};
\node[failure] (R4OPEN) at (\layersep,-15) {OPEN};
\path (R4) edge (R4SHORT);
\path (R4) edge (R4OPEN);
\end{tikzpicture}
% End of code
\caption{DAG representing failure modes of an Op-amp}
@ -430,7 +498,7 @@ We can represent these failure modes on a DAG (see figure~\ref{fig:op1dag}).
%\clearpage
\section{Bringing the OP amp and the current balance/virtual ground together}
\section{{\fg} forrmed from OP amp and the potential divider {\dcs}}
We can now consider bringing the OP amp and the current balance/virtual ground together to
model the non inverting amplifier. We have the failure modes of the functional group for the current balance/virtual ground,
@ -471,7 +539,6 @@ We can now crate a {\fg} for the non-inverting amplifier
by bringing together the failure modes from \textbf{opamp} and \textbf{PD}.
Each of these failure modes will be given a test case for analysis,
and this is represented in table \ref{ampfmea}.
}
{
}
@ -479,7 +546,7 @@ and this is represented in table \ref{ampfmea}.
\clearpage
\begin{table}[ht]
\caption{Non Inverting Amplifier: Failure Mode Effects Analysis: Single Faults} % title of Table
\caption{Inverting Amplifier: Failure Mode Effects Analysis: Single Faults} % title of Table
\centering % used for centering table
\begin{tabular}{||l|c|c|l|l||}
\hline \hline
@ -488,12 +555,20 @@ and this is represented in table \ref{ampfmea}.
% R & wire & res + & res - & description
\hline
\hline
TC1: $OPAMP$ LatchUP & Output High & & AMPHigh \\
TC2: $OPAMP$ LatchDown & Output Low : Low gain& & AMPLow \\ \hline
TC3: $OPAMP$ No Operation & Output Low & & AMPLow \\
TC4: $OPAMP$ Low Slew & Low pass filtering & & LowPass \\ \hline
TC5: $PD$ LowPD & Output High & & AMPHigh \\ \hline
TC6: $PD$ HighPD & Output Low : Low Gain& & AMPLow \\ \hline
% TC1: $R3_{OPEN}$ & Output High & & AMPHigh \\
% TC2: $R3_{SHORT}$ & Output Low : Low gain& & AMPLow \\ \hline
%
% TC3: $R4_{OPEN}$ LatchUP & Output High & & AMPHigh \\
% TC4: $R4_{SHORT}$ LatchDown & Output Low : Low gain& & AMPLow \\ \hline
%
% TC5: $OPAMP$ LatchUP & Output High & & AMPHigh \\
% TC6: $OPAMP$ LatchDown & Output Low : Low gain& & AMPLow \\ \hline
% TC7: $OPAMP$ No Operation & Output Low & & AMPLow \\
% TC8: $OPAMP$ Low Slew & Low pass filtering & & LowPass \\ \hline
TC9: $PD$ LowPD & Output High & & AMPHigh \\
TC10: $PD$ HighPD & Output Low : Low Gain& & AMPLow \\ \hline
%TC7: $R_2$ OPEN & LOW & & LowPD \\ \hline
\hline
\end{tabular}

2
noninvopamp/noninvopamp.tex
View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
\label{lab:nonivopamp}
\ifthenelse {\boolean{paper}}
{