Adelard smart instruments paper

mybib.bib

@@ -306,6 +306,21 @@ ISSN={Doi:10.1145/2330667.2330683},}
   YEAR =         "2012"
 }
 
+@ARTICLE{justifysmartnuke,
+year={2005},
+isbn={978-3-540-29200-5},
+booktitle={Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security},
+volume={3688},
+series={Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
+editor={Winther, Rune and Gran, BjørnAxel and Dahll, Gustav},
+doi={10.1007/11563228_15},
+title={Justification of Smart Sensors for Nuclear Applications},
+url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11563228_15},
+publisher={Springer Berlin Heidelberg},
+author={Bishop, Peter and Bloomfield, Robin and Guerra, Sofia and Tourlas, Kostas},
+pages={194-207}
+}
+
 @ARTICLE{sfmeainterface,
 author={Ozarin, N.W.},
 booktitle={Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2009. RAMS 2009. Annual}, 

submission_thesis/CH3_FMEA_criticism/copy.tex

@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ with firmware to read the user controls, and display results on an LCD.
 For quality control, many safety critical processes require regular inspections
 and measurements of physical characteristics of materials and machinery.
 %
-For highly critical systems e.g. the nuclear industry~\cite{parnas1991assessment}, 
+For highly critical systems e.g. the nuclear industry~\cite{justifysmartnuke,parnas1991assessment}, 
 the instruments used to perform these measurements, must be analysed using traditional assessment (which entails
 FMEA), to ensure that failure modes within the instrument cannot lead to invalid measurements.
 %