lme
This commit is contained in:
parent
8fc07bb908
commit
b2e599e2de
@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ hours of operation. This figure is referred to as a FIT\footnote{FIT values are
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
A thermistor, bead type, non military spec is given a FIT of 3150.
|
A thermistor, bead type, non military spec is given a FIT of 3150.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Using the RIAC finding we can draw up the following table \ref{tab:stat_single},
|
Using the RIAC finding we can draw up the following table (table \ref{tab:stat_single}),
|
||||||
showing the FIT values for all faults considered.
|
showing the FIT values for all faults considered.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -405,6 +405,10 @@ test cases. The PT100 circuit here has a FIT of 3177.6.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
A Probablistic tree can now be drawn, with a FIT value for the PT100
|
A Probablistic tree can now be drawn, with a FIT value for the PT100
|
||||||
circuit and FIT values for all the component fault modes that it was calculated from.
|
circuit and FIT values for all the component fault modes that it was calculated from.
|
||||||
|
We can see from this that that the most likely fault is the thermistor going OPEN.
|
||||||
|
This circuit is 8 times more likely to fail in this way than in any other.
|
||||||
|
Were we to need a more reliable temperature sensor this would probably
|
||||||
|
be the fault~mode we would scrutinise first.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}[h+]
|
\begin{figure}[h+]
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user