robin/Robin_PHD
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ARRRGGGGHHH tikz with a spelling mistake,

Browse Source 
errors are so difficult to find
This commit is contained in:
Robin Clark 2011-06-12 13:52:21 +01:00
parent dd66f7af4c
commit 9daaea00f0
1 changed files with 5 additions and 47 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

52
fmmd_concept/System_safety_2011/submission.tex
View File

@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ we can assign the failure modes of $OPEN$ and $SHORT$ to each of the resistors.
This is shown as a graph in figure \ref{fig:rdag}.
%\ifthenelse {\boolean{dag}}
{
%{
We can now represent a resistor in terms of its failure modes as a directed acyclic graph (DAG)
(see figure \ref{fig:rdag}).
\begin{figure}[h+]
@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ We can now represent a resistor in terms of its failure modes as a directed acyc
\caption{DAG representing a reistor and its failure modes}
\label{fig:rdag}
\end{figure}
}
%}
%{
%}
Thus or the potential divider in the circuit in figure~\ref{fig:pd},
@ -432,59 +432,17 @@ $R1$ has failure modes $\{R1\_OPEN, R1\_SHORT\}$ and $R2$ has failure modes $\{R
%\clearpage
\section{Failure Mode Analysis of the Potential Divider}
\paragraph{Failure Mode Analysis of the Potential Divider}
%\ifthenelse {\boolean{dag}}
{
%{
Modelling the two resistors as a functional group, we present this as a directed graph.
%failure modes, taken from the components R1 and R2,
%in the potential divider, shown
in figure \ref{fig:fg1dag}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\begin{tikzpicture}[shorten >=1pt,->,draw=black!50, node distance=\layersep]
\tikzstyle{every pin edge}=[<-,shorten <=1pt]
\tikzstyle{fmmde}=[circle,fill=black!25,minimum size=30pt,inner sep=0pt]
\tikzstyle{component}=[fmmde, fill=green!50];
\tikzstyle{failure}=[fmmde, fill=red!50];
\tikzstyle{symptom}=[fmmde, fill=blue!50];
\tikzstyle{annot} = [text width=4em, text centered]
\node[component] (R1) at (0,-4) {$R_1$};
\node[component] (R2) at (0,-6) {$R_2$};
\node[failure] (R1SHORT) at (\layersep,-2) {$R1_{SHORT}$};
\node[failure] (R1OPEN) at (\layersep,-4) {$R1_{OPEN}$};
\node[failure] (R2SHORT) at (\layersep,-6) {$R2_{SHORT}$};
\node[failure] (R2OPEN) at (\layersep,-8) {$R2_{OPEN}$};
\path (R1) edge (R1SHORT);
\path (R1) edge (R1OPEN);
\path (R2) edge (R2SHORT);
\path (R2) edge (R2OPEN);
% Potential divider failure modes
%
%\node[symptom] (PDHIGH) at (\layersep*2,-4) {$PD_{HIGH}$};
%\node[symptom] (PDLOW) at (\layersep*2,-6) {$PD_{LOW}$};
%\path (R1OPEN) edge (PDHIGH);
%\path (R2SHORT) edge (PDHIGH);
%\path (R2OPEN) edge (PDLOW);
%\path (R1SHORT) edge (PDLOW);
\end{tikzpicture}
\caption{DAG representing the functional group `Potential Divider'}
\label{fig:fg1dag}
\end{figure}
}
%{
%}
We can now look at each of these base component failure modes,
and determine how they will affect the operation of the potential divider.
@ -521,7 +479,7 @@ This is represented in the DAG in figure \ref{fig:fg1adag}.
\tikzstyle{every pin edge}=[<-,shorten <=1pt]
\tikzstyle{fmmde}=[circle,fill=black!25,minimum size=30pt,inner sep=0pt]
\tikzstyle{component}=[fmmde, fill=green!50];
\tikzstyle{faitinylure}=[fmmde, fill=red!50];
\tikzstyle{failure}=[fmmde, fill=red!50];
\tikzstyle{symptom}=[fmmde, fill=blue!50];
\tikzstyle{annot} = [text width=4em, text centered]