Added FMEA section
This commit is contained in:
parent
31e5fd9c15
commit
94b40f096e
@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ We can now derive a `component' to represent this amplifier configuration (see f
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
%failure mode contours).
|
%failure mode contours).
|
||||||
%\clearpage
|
%\clearpage
|
||||||
|
\clearpage
|
||||||
\section{Failure Mode as a Directed Acyclic Graph}
|
\section{Failure Modes from non inverting amplifier as a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG)}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We can now represent the FMMD analysis as a directed graph, see figure \ref{fig:noninvdag0}.
|
We can now represent the FMMD analysis as a directed graph, see figure \ref{fig:noninvdag0}.
|
||||||
With the information structured in this way, we can trace the high level failure mode symptoms
|
With the information structured in this way, we can trace the high level failure mode symptoms
|
||||||
@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ back to their potential causes.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%\clearpage
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Extracting Fault Trees from the DAG}
|
\section{Extracting Fault Trees from the DAG}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -525,13 +525,88 @@ The FTA diagram directly derived from the FMMD DAG is shown in figure \ref{fig:n
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
%\clearpage
|
%\clearpage
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
show an example fault tree, showing the causes and logical (only OR's here)
|
%show an example fault tree, showing the causes and logical (only OR's here)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Extracting FMEA Analysis from the DAG}
|
\subsection{Information missing in FTA}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Extract for each component failure mode the system level cause
|
to expand: Each FTA deals only with one symptom.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\subsubsection{Further refinements}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
to expand: Cuts sets and minimal cut sets.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\clearpage
|
||||||
|
\section{Assisting FMEA reports from the DAG}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A design FMEA, or potential failure mode and effects analysis
|
||||||
|
will typically require the designer to look at the possible effects
|
||||||
|
of all the component failure modes in the system under investigation.
|
||||||
|
\ifthenelse {\boolean{paper}}
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
%FMEA - brief description for paper...
|
||||||
|
Design FMEA is methodology for assessing potential reliability/dangerous condition early
|
||||||
|
in the development cycle.
|
||||||
|
FMEA is used to identify potential failure modes,
|
||||||
|
determine their effect on the operation of the product,
|
||||||
|
and identify actions to mitigate the failures.
|
||||||
|
FMEA relies anticipating what {\em might} go wrong with a product.
|
||||||
|
While anticipating every failure mode is not possible, a development team should
|
||||||
|
collate as complete a list of potential failure modes as possible.
|
||||||
|
With an FMMD sourced failure mode to symptom mapping, this
|
||||||
|
list should be more complete. It will for instance include
|
||||||
|
not only an entry every component failure mode, but has a formal
|
||||||
|
reasoning process behind it, which leads to the symptom.
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
See section \ref{pfmea} for an overview of FMEA.
|
||||||
|
FMEA relies anticipating what {\em might} go wrong with a product.
|
||||||
|
While anticipating every failure mode is not possible, a development team should
|
||||||
|
collate as complete a list of potential failure modes as possible.
|
||||||
|
With an FMMD sourced failure mode to symptom mapping, this
|
||||||
|
list should be more complete. It will for instance include
|
||||||
|
not only an entry every component failure mode, but has a formal
|
||||||
|
reasoning process behind it, which leads to the symptom.
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
We have from the DAG model, a direct path from each component failure
|
||||||
|
mode to potential symptoms. This allows us to partially fill in
|
||||||
|
the FMEA report. The detectability and severity of the symptom
|
||||||
|
are subjective. Given component failure rates, the probability
|
||||||
|
of the the potential cause occurring can be calculated, using the FMD-91~\cite{fmd91} and MIL1991~\cite{mil1991}
|
||||||
|
component failure mode statistical references.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{table}[ht]
|
||||||
|
\caption{Non Inverting Amplifier: Failure Mode Effects Analysis: Single Faults} % title of Table
|
||||||
|
\centering % used for centering table
|
||||||
|
\begin{tabular}{||l|l|c|l|c|c|c||}
|
||||||
|
\hline \hline
|
||||||
|
\textbf{Item} & \textbf{Potential Failure} & \textbf{ Sev } & \textbf{Potential} & \textbf{prob} & \textbf{det} & \textbf{RPN} \\
|
||||||
|
\textbf{Function} & \textbf{mode} & \textbf{ /cost }& \textbf{Cause} & \textbf{/occ } & \textbf{} & \\\hline
|
||||||
|
\hline
|
||||||
|
Non Inverting & $AMP_{high}$ & & $R1_{short} $ & & & \\
|
||||||
|
Amplifier & $AMP_{low}$ & & $R1_{open} $ & & & \\
|
||||||
|
Circuit & $AMP_{low}$ & & $R2_{short} $ & & & \\
|
||||||
|
& $AMP_{high}$ & & $R2_{open}$ & & & \\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
& $AMP_{lowpass}$ & & $OPAMP_{lowslew}$ & & & \\
|
||||||
|
& $AMP_{low}$ & & $OPAMP_{latchdown}$ & & & \\
|
||||||
|
& $AMP_{high}$ & & $OPAMP_{latchup}$ & & & \\
|
||||||
|
& $AMP_{low}$ & & $OPAMP_{noop} $ & & & \\
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\hline
|
||||||
|
\hline
|
||||||
|
\hline
|
||||||
|
\end{tabular}
|
||||||
|
\label{ampfmea}
|
||||||
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\subsection{Information missing in FMEA}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
to expand: Each FMEA looses the reasoning in the FMMD Hierarchy/DAG for linking
|
||||||
|
the symptoms to the potential causes.
|
||||||
|
FMEA can miss symptoms especially where a component failure mode may cause more than one top-level symptom.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Extracting FMECA from the DAG}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Work out the alpha and beta values !!!
|
Work out the alpha and beta values !!!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user