morning edit

This commit is contained in:
Robin Clark 2010-12-08 16:52:15 +00:00
parent ec2f9470ec
commit 8c485650ad
2 changed files with 11 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ build hierarchical bottom-up models of failure mode behaviour.
%for a given type of part can be obtained from standard literature~\cite{mil1991} %for a given type of part can be obtained from standard literature~\cite{mil1991}
%\cite{mech}. %The failure modes for a given component $K$ form a set $F$. %\cite{mech}. %The failure modes for a given component $K$ form a set $F$.
\label{defs}
%% %%
%% Paragraph component and its relationship to its failure modes %% Paragraph component and its relationship to its failure modes
%% %%

View File

@ -1190,16 +1190,14 @@ chosing {\fg}s and working bottom-up this hierarchical trait will occur as a nat
The UML models thus far in this The UML models thus far in this
\ifthenelse {\boolean{paper}} \ifthenelse {\boolean{paper}}
{ {
paper %paper
}
{
chapter
}
have been used to develop the data relationships required to perform FMMD analysis. have been used to develop the data relationships required to perform FMMD analysis.
This section re-organises and rationalises the UML model. This section re-organises and rationalises the UML model.
We want to be able to use {\dcs} in functional groups.
It therefore makes sense for {\dc} to inherit {\em component}.
The re-factored UML diagram is shown in figure \ref{fig:refactored_uml}.
GO THROUGH INHERITANCE RELATIONSHIPS ETC
\begin{figure}[h] \begin{figure}[h]
\centering \centering
@ -1209,6 +1207,12 @@ GO THROUGH INHERITANCE RELATIONSHIPS ETC
\label{fig:refactored_uml} \label{fig:refactored_uml}
\end{figure} \end{figure}
}
{
% chapter
The terms used in FMMD and the UML data model are refined in the
chapter \ref{defs}.
}
\section{Conclusion} \section{Conclusion}