This commit is contained in:
Robin Clark 2010-11-09 14:05:14 +00:00
parent 567096481c
commit 88e3a81153

View File

@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ as specified in newer European Safety Standards \cite{en298}.
The proposed methodology is bottom-up and can guarantee to leave no component failure mode unhandled. The proposed methodology is bottom-up and can guarantee to leave no component failure mode unhandled.
It is also modular, meaning that the results of analysed components may be re-used in other projects. It is also modular, meaning that the results of analysed components may be re-used in other projects.
} }
}
{ {
%%% CHAPTER INTO NEARLT THE SAME AS ABSTRACT %%% CHAPTER INTO NEARLT THE SAME AS ABSTRACT
@ -266,7 +267,7 @@ a prioritised `todo list', with higher the $RPN$ values being the most urgent.
\item No possibility to model base component level double failure modes. \item No possibility to model base component level double failure modes.
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
\paragrah{NOTE.} FMEA is sometimes used in its literal sense, that is to say \paragraph{note.} FMEA is sometimes used in its literal sense, that is to say
failure Mode effects Analysis, simply looking at a systems internal failure failure Mode effects Analysis, simply looking at a systems internal failure
modes and determing what may happen as a result. modes and determing what may happen as a result.
FMEA described in this section is sometimes called `production FMEA'. FMEA described in this section is sometimes called `production FMEA'.