uggghhhhhh jag prutar for mycket
This commit is contained in:
parent
ded619e4de
commit
815d0a614f
@ -376,13 +376,13 @@ If we require FMMD to produce full FTA diagrams, we need to add these
|
||||
attributes to the FMMD UML model\footnote{Top down failure mode models, such as FTA, are additionally
|
||||
useful in guiding diagnostic analysis.}.
|
||||
\fmmdglossINHIBIT
|
||||
|
||||
%
|
||||
\paragraph{Environment, operational states and inhibit gates: additions to the UML model.}
|
||||
|
||||
%
|
||||
FTA, in addition to using symbols borrowed from digital logic introduces three new symbols to
|
||||
model environmental, operational state and inhibit gates; % we discuss here
|
||||
how these can be incorporated into the FMMD model is discussed below.
|
||||
|
||||
%
|
||||
A system will be expected to perform in a given environment.
|
||||
%
|
||||
Environment in the context of this study
|
||||
@ -488,11 +488,11 @@ are added to UML diagram in figure \ref{fig:cfg} are represented in figure \ref
|
||||
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Retrospective Failure Mode analysis and FMMD}
|
||||
\subsection{Retrospective failure mode analysis and FMMD}
|
||||
|
||||
The reasons for applying retrospective failure mode analysis could be:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item approving previously un-assessed systems to a safety standard,
|
||||
%\item approving previously un-assessed systems to a safety standard,
|
||||
\item to re-visit a safety analysis after a small h/w or s/w change,
|
||||
\item upon discovery of a new {\bc} {\fm},
|
||||
\item or to determine the failure mode behaviour of an previously un-assessed instrument used in safety critical verification.
|
||||
@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ failure modes.
|
||||
%come to light.
|
||||
%
|
||||
%
|
||||
\paragraph{Retrospective Failure Mode analysis and software.}
|
||||
\paragraph{Retrospective failure mode analysis and software.}
|
||||
%
|
||||
We can apply retrospective FMMD to electronic and software hybrid systems as well.
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user