From 6f9ff6ab59378bf57dc2d8f1eed007b36d397375 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robin Clark Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:35:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] last few first person refs found by grep --- submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex | 2 +- submission_thesis/CH4_FMMD/copy.tex | 8 ++++---- submission_thesis/CH6_Software_Examples/software.tex | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex b/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex index f5a2b6f..e9ab905 100644 --- a/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex +++ b/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ failure modes as an intrinsic part of its process, which can be considered a wea \label{sec:detectable} \fmmdglossOBS Often the effects of a failure mode may be easy to detect, -and our equipment can react by raising an alarm or compensating for the resulting fault. +and equipment can react by raising an alarm or compensating for the resulting fault. % Some failure modes may cause undetectable failures, for instance a component that causes a measured reading to change could have adverse consequences yet not be flagged as a failure. diff --git a/submission_thesis/CH4_FMMD/copy.tex b/submission_thesis/CH4_FMMD/copy.tex index ca9507e..41027ff 100644 --- a/submission_thesis/CH4_FMMD/copy.tex +++ b/submission_thesis/CH4_FMMD/copy.tex @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ The above definition of a part, needs further refinement, i.e. to be defined as an atomic entity. % used as a building block. %The term component, in American English, can mean a building block or a part. %In British-English a component generally is given to mean the definition for part above. -{\Bc} is defined as the lowest level entity ---an entity with which we begin our analysis---a component +{\Bc} is defined as the lowest level entity --- an entity with which to begin analysis --- a component used as a starting bottom-up building block. %This is a choice made by the analyst, often guided by the standards to which the analysis is being performed. % to. % @@ -953,7 +953,7 @@ to see how they could be caused. \fmeagloss % The aim of FMMD analysis is to produce complete\footnote{Completeness dependent upon the completeness/correctness of the {\fms} supplied by the germane standard - for our {\bcs}.} failure + for the {\bcs}.} failure models of safety critical systems from the bottom-up, starting where possible with known base~component failure~modes. % @@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ component used to build the functional group it was derived from plus 1. So a derived component built from base level components would have an $\abslev$ value of 1. % -In our example the resistors and op-amp are level zero ({\bcs}, $\abslev=0$), the {\em PD} a level 1 {\dc} ($\abslev=1$) and the {\em INVAMP} +In this example the resistors and op-amp are level zero ({\bcs}, $\abslev=0$), the {\em PD} a level 1 {\dc} ($\abslev=1$) and the {\em INVAMP} a level 2 {\dc} ($\abslev=2$). %\clearpage Because {\fgs} may include components at varying levels @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ The abstraction level concept is formally defined in appendix~\ref{sec:abstracti %Tie into wish list at end of chapter 3. Solves state explosion, completeness, traceability, models for related such as FMECA \paragraph{Failure model Completeness.} It is undesirable to miss any component {\fm} in the analysis process; were this to -happen our failure model would be incomplete. +happen the failure model would be incomplete. % Given the starting conditions of base component {\fms} from the literature, it can be ensured that all these {\fms} are traceable to subsequent {\dc} {\fms} diff --git a/submission_thesis/CH6_Software_Examples/software.tex b/submission_thesis/CH6_Software_Examples/software.tex index 689b970..ff565d9 100644 --- a/submission_thesis/CH6_Software_Examples/software.tex +++ b/submission_thesis/CH6_Software_Examples/software.tex @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ by stating: % $$ fm(\cf{Read\_ADC}) = \{ CHAN\_NO, VREF, VV\_ERR \} $$ % -With the failure mode model for our function, it is used in conjunction +With the failure mode model for this function, it is used in conjunction with the ADC hardware {\dc} CMATV, to form a {\fg} $G_2$, where $G_2 =\{ CMATV, \cf{Read\_ADC} \}$. % This {\fg} is analysed in table~\ref{tbl:radc}. %{ hardware/software combined {\fg}. @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ can fail. An $OUT\_OF\_RANGE$ condition will be flagged by the error flag variab The $VAL\_ERR$ will simply mean that the value read is incorrect: an undetectable {\fm} and therefore undesirable condition. % -Finally a {\dc} is created to represent a failure mode model for our +Finally a {\dc} is created to represent a failure mode model for the combined hardware and software {\ft} input. % failure mode model. % This can be named $ R420I $, for {\em read {\ft} input}.