From 6b18adfcc3cf8f06b4ab0267d8e3d437d5c775b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Robin P. Clark" <robin48gx@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:48:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] jag vill har nagra kul saker....

---
 submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex | 38 +++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex b/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex
index 9b9385e..cdb6b99 100644
--- a/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex
+++ b/submission_thesis/CH5_Examples/copy.tex
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ this examines re-use of the potential divider {\dc} from section~\ref{subsec:pot
 This amplifier is analysed twice, using different compositions of {\fgs}. 
 The two approaches, i.e. effects of choice of membership for {\fgs} are then discussed.
 %\
-fmmdglossOPAMP
+\fmmdglossOPAMP
 \item Section~\ref{sec:diffamp} analyses a circuit where two op-amps are used 
 to create a differencing amplifier. 
 Building on the two approaches from section~\ref{sec:invamp}, re-use of the non-inverting amplifier {\dc} from section~\ref{sec:invamp}
@@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ by analysing a sigma delta ADC.
 safety critical temperature sensor circuit, analysed for single and double failure mode scenarios.
 \end{itemize}
  
+
+
+
+
+
 \clearpage
 \section{Example Analysis: Inverting OPAMP}
 %
@@ -66,6 +71,19 @@ safety critical temperature sensor circuit, analysed for single and double failu
  \label{fig:invamp}
 \end{figure}
 %
+Figure~\ref{fig:invamp} shows a standard configuration inverting amplifier.
+A valid range for the output value of this circuit is assumed.
+%
+%Thus negative or low voltages can be considered as LOW
+%and voltages higher than a given threshold considered as  HIGH.
+%
+Because the amplifier inverts and the input is guaranteed positive any 
+output voltage above or equal to zero  would be erroneous.
+%
+This would be an `$AMP_{HIGH}$' failure symptom. 
+%
+A threshold would be determined for an `$AMP_{LOW}$' failure symptom (i.e. the output voltage more negative than expected). % error given the expected input range.
+%
 %This configuration is interesting from methodology pers.
 There are two obvious ways in which this circuit can be modelled.
 %
@@ -100,17 +118,6 @@ In normal operation then, this is an inverted potential divider.
 It must therefore be  viewed as an inverted potential divider 
 and analysed as such; see table~\ref{tbl:pdneg}.
 %
-A valid range for the output value of this circuit is assumed.
-%
-%Thus negative or low voltages can be considered as LOW
-%and voltages higher than a given threshold considered as  HIGH.
-%
-Because the amplifier inverts and the input is guaranteed positive any 
-output voltage above or equal to zero  would be erroneous.
-%
-This would be an $AMP_{HIGH}$ failure symptom. 
-%
-A threshold would be determined for an $AMP_{LOW}$ failure symptom (i.e. the output voltage more negative than expected). % error given the expected input range.
 %
 \begin{table}[h+]
 \caption{Inverted Potential divider: Single failure analysis}
@@ -199,6 +206,7 @@ by forming a {\fg} with the OpAmp and the new {\dc} $IPD$.
 \end{table}
 %
 %
+\clearpage
 %%This gives the same results as the analysis from figure~\ref{fig:invampanalysis}.
 %
 %
@@ -303,7 +311,7 @@ by forming a {\fg} with the OpAmp and the new {\dc} $IPD$.
 Failure modes for the {\dc}  $INVAMP$ can be expressed thus;
 %% $$ fm(INVAMP) = \{  {lowpass}, {high}, {low} \}.$$
  $$ fm(INVAMP) = \{ HIGH, LOW, LOW PASS \} .$$
- 
+% \clearpage
 A DAG is drawn representing the failure mode behaviour of
 this amplifier (see figure~\ref{fig:invdag1}). 
 %
@@ -311,8 +319,8 @@ Note that this allows failure symptoms to be traced back to causes, i.e.
 to traverse from system level or top failure modes to base component failure modes.
 %%%%% 12DEC 2012 UP to here in notes from AF email.
 %
-\clearpage
 %
+\clearpage
 \subsection{Second Approach: Inverting OpAmp analysing with three components in one larger {\fg}}
 \label{subsec:invamp2}
 
@@ -368,7 +376,7 @@ This concern is re-visited in the differencing amplifier example in the next sec
 \label{tbl:invamp}
 \end{table}
 
-\clearpage
+%\clearpage
 
 \subsection{Comparison between the two approaches}
 \label{sec:invampcc}