polish polish polish
This commit is contained in:
parent
c4bf1cd625
commit
695e60257d
15
mybib.bib
15
mybib.bib
@ -243,8 +243,7 @@ ISSN={Doi:10.1145/2330667.2330683},}
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
@BOOK{boffin,
|
@BOOK{boffin,
|
||||||
AUTHOR = "R Hanbury Brown",
|
AUTHOR = "R Hanbury Brown",
|
||||||
TITLE = "Boffin: A Personal Story of the Early Days of Radar, Radio Astronomy and Quantum Optics:
|
TITLE = "Boffin: A Personal Story of the Early Days of Radar, Radio Astronomy and Quantum Optics",
|
||||||
Personal Story of the Early Days of Radar and Radio Astronomy and Quantum Optics ",
|
|
||||||
PUBLISHER = " Adam Hilger: ISBN 0-85274-317-3",
|
PUBLISHER = " Adam Hilger: ISBN 0-85274-317-3",
|
||||||
YEAR = "1991"
|
YEAR = "1991"
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -420,7 +419,7 @@ doi={10.1109/HASE.2004.1281774},
|
|||||||
ISSN={1530-2059},}
|
ISSN={1530-2059},}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@book{stranks2007human,
|
@book{stranks2007human,
|
||||||
title={Human Factors and Behavioural Safety},
|
title={Human Factors and Behavioural Safety ISBN 978-0-7506-5510-1},
|
||||||
author={Stranks, J.},
|
author={Stranks, J.},
|
||||||
isbn={978-0-7506-6542-1},
|
isbn={978-0-7506-6542-1},
|
||||||
url={http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7RXYN2CIphMC},
|
url={http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7RXYN2CIphMC},
|
||||||
@ -465,7 +464,7 @@ year={2001},
|
|||||||
month={},
|
month={},
|
||||||
volume={7},
|
volume={7},
|
||||||
number={},
|
number={},
|
||||||
pages={7 -3458 vol.7},
|
pages={vol.7},
|
||||||
keywords={Analytical models;Design automation;Design engineering;Discrete event simulation;Failure analysis;Hybrid power systems;Performance analysis;Production;Propulsion;Steady-state;aerospace computing;aerospace simulation;discrete event simulation;engineering computing;failure analysis;production engineering computing;CONFIG hybrid discrete event simulator;EPOCH Simulation for Failure Analysis software;EPOCH algorithm;automated incremental design FMEA;automatic generation;design models;engineering product/operations cross-cutting hybrid simulation ;failure modes;failure modes/effects analysis;functional labels;propellant production plant;scenario scripts;scenario-based analyses;space systems;timestep modeling;},
|
keywords={Analytical models;Design automation;Design engineering;Discrete event simulation;Failure analysis;Hybrid power systems;Performance analysis;Production;Propulsion;Steady-state;aerospace computing;aerospace simulation;discrete event simulation;engineering computing;failure analysis;production engineering computing;CONFIG hybrid discrete event simulator;EPOCH Simulation for Failure Analysis software;EPOCH algorithm;automated incremental design FMEA;automatic generation;design models;engineering product/operations cross-cutting hybrid simulation ;failure modes;failure modes/effects analysis;functional labels;propellant production plant;scenario scripts;scenario-based analyses;space systems;timestep modeling;},
|
||||||
doi={10.1109/AERO.2001.931423},
|
doi={10.1109/AERO.2001.931423},
|
||||||
ISSN={}}
|
ISSN={}}
|
||||||
@ -540,7 +539,7 @@ ISSN={2166-563X},}
|
|||||||
@ARTICLE{fmd91,
|
@ARTICLE{fmd91,
|
||||||
AUTHOR = "Reliability Analysis Center",
|
AUTHOR = "Reliability Analysis Center",
|
||||||
TITLE = "Failure Mode/Mechanisms Distributions 1991",
|
TITLE = "Failure Mode/Mechanisms Distributions 1991",
|
||||||
JOURNAL = "United States Department of Commerce",
|
JOURNAL = "United States Department of Commerce: F30602-91-C-0002",
|
||||||
YEAR = "1991"
|
YEAR = "1991"
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -802,7 +801,7 @@ year = {2012},
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
@BOOK{dbcbe,
|
@BOOK{dbcbe,
|
||||||
AUTHOR = "R. Mitchel",
|
AUTHOR = "R. Mitchel",
|
||||||
TITLE = "Design By Contract by Example",
|
TITLE = "Design By Contract by Example ISBN-13: 978-0201634600",
|
||||||
PUBLISHER = "Adisson-Wesley",
|
PUBLISHER = "Adisson-Wesley",
|
||||||
YEAR = "2002"
|
YEAR = "2002"
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -889,7 +888,7 @@ strength of materials, the causes of boiler explosions",
|
|||||||
pages = {I-XII, 1-645},
|
pages = {I-XII, 1-645},
|
||||||
publisher = {Pearson / Prentice Hall},
|
publisher = {Pearson / Prentice Hall},
|
||||||
timestamp = {2011-03-24T00:00:00.000+0100},
|
timestamp = {2011-03-24T00:00:00.000+0100},
|
||||||
title = {Electronics - a systems approach (4. ed.).},
|
title = {Electronics - a systems approach (4. ed.). ISBN 978-0-13-129396-0},
|
||||||
year = 2009
|
year = 2009
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -1346,7 +1345,7 @@ OPTissn = {},
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@Book{aoe,
|
@Book{aoe,
|
||||||
title = {The Art of Electronics, 2nd Edition},
|
title = {The Art of Electronics, 2nd Edition ISBN 0-521-37095-7},
|
||||||
publisher = {Cambridge},
|
publisher = {Cambridge},
|
||||||
year = {1989},
|
year = {1989},
|
||||||
author = {Paul Horowitz, Winfield Hill},
|
author = {Paul Horowitz, Winfield Hill},
|
||||||
|
@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ only use {\fms} that are mutually exclusive within components.
|
|||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
The $dtc$ function enforces completeness in the model
|
The $dtc$ function enforces completeness in the model
|
||||||
by ensuring that %for
|
by ensuring that %for
|
||||||
all failure modes in components in the {\fg} are included in at least one test~case.
|
all failure modes of the components in the {\fg} are included in at least one test~case.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
%%
|
%%
|
||||||
@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ $$ fcs(R) = SP .$$
|
|||||||
This raises the failure~mode abstraction level, $\abslev$ (see section~\ref{sec:alpha}).
|
This raises the failure~mode abstraction level, $\abslev$ (see section~\ref{sec:alpha}).
|
||||||
The failures have now been considered not from the component level, but from the sub-system or
|
The failures have now been considered not from the component level, but from the sub-system or
|
||||||
functional~group level.
|
functional~group level.
|
||||||
A set $SP$, the symptoms of failure is obtained.
|
A set $SP$, the symptoms of failure, is obtained.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
\ifthenelse {\boolean{paper}}
|
\ifthenelse {\boolean{paper}}
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
@ -699,7 +699,8 @@ components, where $\abslev$ is a natural number, ($\abslev \in \mathbb{N}_0$).
|
|||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
For a base component, let the abstraction level be zero.
|
For a base component, let the abstraction level be zero.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
The symptom abstraction process is applied giving a $\dc$,
|
The symptom abstraction process %is applied giving
|
||||||
|
gives a $\dc$,
|
||||||
this derived~component will have an $\abslev$ value
|
this derived~component will have an $\abslev$ value
|
||||||
one higher than the highest $\abslev$ value of any of the components
|
one higher than the highest $\abslev$ value of any of the components
|
||||||
in the {\fg} used to derive it.
|
in the {\fg} used to derive it.
|
||||||
|
@ -104,10 +104,7 @@ gives three failure modes:
|
|||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
$$ fm(BubbaOscillator) = \{ NO_{osc}, HI_{fosc}\} . $$ %, LO_{fosc} \} . $$
|
$$ fm(BubbaOscillator) = \{ NO_{osc}, HI_{fosc}\} . $$ %, LO_{fosc} \} . $$
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%\clearpage
|
\clearpage
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{BUFF45: Detailed Analysis}
|
\subsection{BUFF45: Detailed Analysis}
|
||||||
\label{detail:BUFF45}
|
\label{detail:BUFF45}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -262,7 +259,7 @@ $$
|
|||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
Collecting symptoms from table~\ref{tbl:bubba2}, a derived component $BUBBAOSC$ is created which has the following failure modes:
|
Collecting symptoms from table~\ref{tbl:bubba2}, a derived component $BUBBAOSC$ is created which has the following failure modes:
|
||||||
$$
|
$$
|
||||||
fm (BUBBAOSC) = \{ HI_{osc}, NO\_signal .\} % LO_{fosc},
|
fm (BUBBAOSC) = \{ HI_{osc}, NO\_signal \} . % LO_{fosc},
|
||||||
$$
|
$$
|
||||||
\clearpage
|
\clearpage
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ reveal safety weakness and improve built in safety}}}
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\newcommand{\fmmdglossOPAMP}{\glossary{name={Op-Amp},description={
|
\newcommand{\fmmdglossOPAMP}{\glossary{name={Op-Amp},description={
|
||||||
An Operational Amplifier is a differential input high gain voltage
|
An Operational Amplifier is a differential input high gain voltage
|
||||||
amplifier typically implemented in an integrated circuit and is
|
amplifier typically implemented in an integrated circuit and is a
|
||||||
commonly used as a building block in analogue circuit design
|
commonly used element in analogue circuit design
|
||||||
}}}
|
}}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\newcommand{\fmmdglossPFMEA}{\glossary{name={PFMEA},description={
|
\newcommand{\fmmdglossPFMEA}{\glossary{name={PFMEA},description={
|
||||||
@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ for practical consideration, and when this happens `state~explosion' can be said
|
|||||||
\newcommand{\fmmdglossFTA}{\glossary{name={FTA},description={
|
\newcommand{\fmmdglossFTA}{\glossary{name={FTA},description={
|
||||||
Fault Tree Analysis (FTA).
|
Fault Tree Analysis (FTA).
|
||||||
A top down failure analysis technique which starts with undesirable
|
A top down failure analysis technique which starts with undesirable
|
||||||
top level events, and using symbols from digital logic builds
|
top level events, and using symbols from digital logic/electronics builds
|
||||||
a tree, working downwards to putative causes}}}
|
a tree, working downwards to putative causes}}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\newcommand{\fmmdglossFMEDA}{\glossary{name={FMEDA},description={
|
\newcommand{\fmmdglossFMEDA}{\glossary{name={FMEDA},description={
|
||||||
@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ A guard on a process such that if a condition is not met, the process may not co
|
|||||||
The components (software or hardware) and connections from which a particular signal or value is derived}}}
|
The components (software or hardware) and connections from which a particular signal or value is derived}}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\newcommand{\fmmdglossRD}{\glossary{name={reasoning~distance},description={
|
\newcommand{\fmmdglossRD}{\glossary{name={reasoning~distance},description={
|
||||||
A reasoning distance is the number of stages of logic and reasoning,
|
A reasoning distance is the number of components examined against failure scenarios, used to map a failure causes to potential outcomes
|
||||||
counted by the number of components examined, used to map a failure cause to its potential outcomes}}}
|
for a given system}}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\newcommand{\fmmdglossOBS}{\glossary{name={observability}, description={
|
\newcommand{\fmmdglossOBS}{\glossary{name={observability}, description={
|
||||||
If a failure mode cannot be detected it is termed unobservable or undetectable}}}
|
If a failure mode cannot be detected it is termed unobservable or undetectable}}}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user