Ideas for the intro/abstract commented out at mo

This commit is contained in:
Robin Clark 2011-01-21 12:14:48 +00:00
parent 64165962c6
commit 6023c6d5f3

View File

@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ creating failure mode models of safety critical systems, which
has a common notation
for mechanical, electronic and software domains and applies an
incremental and rigorous approach.
%This paper describes how the proposed methodology
%functions, given requirements and constraints (such as number of combinations
%of failure causes for flat ).
%It describes the need for the new methodology to be bottom-up, and
%then the need for incremental modularisation
%to build a fault mode hierarchy, which leads to the conceopt of functional grouping,
%analysis of those groupings, and from that
%the creation of derived components.
%%
%% What I have done
%%
@ -43,6 +51,15 @@ has a common notation
for mechanical, electronic and software domains and applies an
incremental and rigorous approach.
%%
%This chapter describes how the proposed methodology functions
%given requirements and constraints such as the number of combinations
%of failure causes.
%It describes the need for the new methodology to be bottom-up, and
%then the need for incremental modularisation
%to build a fault mode hierarchy, which leads to the conceopt of functional grouping,
%analysis of those groupings, and from that
%the creation of derived components.
%% What I have done
%%
The four main static failure mode analysis methodologies were examined and
@ -1280,6 +1297,14 @@ This
\ifthenelse {\boolean{paper}}
{
paper
describes how the FMMD methodology
functions, given requirements and constraints such as the number of combinations
of failure causes.
It describes the need for the new methodology to be bottom-up, and
then the need for incremental modularisation
to build a fault mode hierarchy, which leads to the conceopt of functional grouping,
analysis of those groupings, and from that
the creation of derived components.
}
{
chapter