JMC proof read 17JUL2012.

This could be the one to submit, have heard nothing back from J Howse.
This commit is contained in:
Robin Clark 2012-07-17 18:05:11 +01:00
parent a6739aaa1b
commit 6003a5d615

View File

@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ failure mode of the component or sub-system}}}
% {-\baslineskip} % {-\baslineskip}
% {0.5\baselineskip} % {0.5\baselineskip}
% {\normalfont\normalsize\itshape}}% % {\normalfont\normalsize\itshape}}%
\linespread{0.95} \linespread{0.953}
\begin{document} \begin{document}
%\pagestyle{fancy} %\pagestyle{fancy}
@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ In order to integrate software, %in a meaningful way
we need to re-think the we need to re-think the
FMEA concept of simply mapping a base component failure to a system level event. FMEA concept of simply mapping a base component failure to a system level event.
% %
One strategy would be to modularise FMEA. To break down the failure effect One strategy would be to modularise FMEA; to break down the failure effect
reasoning into small modules from the bottom-up. reasoning into small modules from the bottom-up.
% %
If we pre-analyse modules, and they If we pre-analyse modules, and they
@ -363,13 +363,14 @@ we can determine its symptoms of failure.
%With these symptoms (a set of derived faults from the perspective of the {\fg}) %With these symptoms (a set of derived faults from the perspective of the {\fg})
%we can now state that the {\fg} %we can now state that the {\fg}
% (as an entity in its own right) % (as an entity in its own right)
can fail in a number of well defined ways. %can fail in a number of well defined ways.
% %
In other words we have taken a {\fg}, and analysed how In other words we have taken a {\fg}, and analysed how
%\textbf{it} %\textbf{it}
it can fail according to the failure modes of its components, and then it can fail according to the failure modes of its components, and then
determine the {\fg} failure symptoms. determine the {\fg} failure symptoms.
We then create a new {\dc} which has as its {\fms} the failure symptoms %
We then create a new {\dc} which has as its {\fms}, the failure symptoms
of the {\fg} from which it was derived. of the {\fg} from which it was derived.
% \paragraph{Creating a derived component.} % \paragraph{Creating a derived component.}
@ -1061,7 +1062,7 @@ shows that by taking a modular approach for FMEA, i.e. FMMD, we can integrate
software and electro-mechanical models. software and electro-mechanical models.
% %
With this analysis With this analysis
we have stages along the `reasoning~path' linking the failures modes from the we have stages along the `reasoning~path' linking the failure modes from the
electronics to those in the software. electronics to those in the software.
Each {\fg} to {\dc} transition represents a Each {\fg} to {\dc} transition represents a
reasoning stage. reasoning stage.