From 4ffc0b39d11c26c883cb4458989836c82948ae98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robin Clark Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 07:28:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arrggggghhhhhh --- .../appendixes/detailed_analysis.tex | 20 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/submission_thesis/appendixes/detailed_analysis.tex b/submission_thesis/appendixes/detailed_analysis.tex index 2d84e09..3c8c73e 100644 --- a/submission_thesis/appendixes/detailed_analysis.tex +++ b/submission_thesis/appendixes/detailed_analysis.tex @@ -529,11 +529,11 @@ $$ \textbf{cause} & & \textbf{Effect} & & \\ \hline \hline - FS1: $FFB$ $OUTPUT STUCK$ & & value max high or low & & $OUTPUT\_OUT\_OF\_RANGE$ \\ + FS1: $FFB$ $OUTPUT STUCK$ & & value held high or low & & $OUTPUT\_OUT\_OF\_RANGE$ \\ FS2: $FFB$ $LOW\_SLEW$ & & values will appear larger & & $OUTPUT\_INCORRECT$ \\ % FS3: $IC4^0$ $NOOP$ & & output stuck low & & $OUTPUT STUCK$ \\ \hline %\hline - FS3: $BISJ$ $OUTPUT STUCK$ & & value max high or low & & $OUTPUT\_OUT\_OF\_RANGE$ \\ + FS3: $BISJ$ $OUTPUT STUCK$ & & value held high or low & & $OUTPUT\_OUT\_OF\_RANGE$ \\ FS4: $BISJ$ $REDUCED\_INTEGRATION$ & & values will appear larger & & $OUTPUT\_INCORRECT$ \\ \hline @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ FMMD analysis tables from chapter~\ref{sec:chap6}. & from ADC value low & \\ \hline FC5: post condition fails & software failure & $VAL\_ERR$ \\ - in function read\_ADC & read\_ADC & \\ \hline + in function \cf{read\_ADC} & \cf{read\_ADC} & \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table} @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ $$ & temperature reading & \\ \hline FC5: post condition fails & software failure & temp\_incorrect \\ - in function convert\_ADC\_to\_T & convert\_ADC\_to\_T & \\ \hline + in function \cf{convert\_ADC\_to\_T} & \cf{convert\_ADC\_to\_T} & \\ \hline \hline @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ The lower the PID error value the closer to the controlled systems target/desire & undetectable failure mode & \\ \hline FC3: post condition fails & software failure & IncorrectErrorValue \\ - in function \cf{determine\_set\_point\_error} & determine\_set\_point\_error & \\ \hline + in function \cf{determine\_set\_point\_error} & \cf{determine\_set\_point\_error} & \\ \hline \end{tabular} @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ $$ FC3: post condition fails & software failure & IncorrectControlErrorV \\ - in function \cf{PID} & PID & \\ \hline + in function \cf{PID} & \cf{PID} & \\ \hline \end{tabular} @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ $$ FC5: GPIO stuck Low & LED permanently ON & FailureIndicated \\ \hline - FC6: Software SetLEDs & Incorrect Indication & IndicationError \\ + FC6: Software \cf{SetLEDs} & Incorrect Indication & IndicationError \\ fails to set outputs correctly & Post condition failure & \\ \hline @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ $$ FC12: micro-controller & processor will not run & ControlFailureIndicated \\ CLOCK\_STOPPED & indicator leds will not flash & \\ \hline - FC13: monitor: & postcondition fails & ControlFailure \\ + FC13: \cf{monitor}: & postcondition fails & ControlFailure \\ software fails & & \\ \hline @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ Using the above table~\ref{tab:stat_single} is presented which lists the FIT val \fmmdglossFIT % \begin{table}[h+] -\caption{Pt100 FMEA Single // Fault Statistics} % title of Table +\caption{Pt100 FMEA Single Fault Statistics} % title of Table \centering % used for centering table \begin{tabular}{||l|c|c|l|l||} \hline \hline @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ be the fault~mode scrutinised first. \label{fig:stat_single} \end{figure} % -The Pt100 analysis presents a simple result for single faults. +%The Pt100 analysis presents a simple result for single faults. % %The next analysis phase looks at how the circuit will behave under double simultaneous failure %conditions.