diff --git a/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex b/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex index c2b4a0d..2ad74fb 100644 --- a/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex +++ b/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex @@ -1476,6 +1476,8 @@ potential strategies are listed below: \item Look at components forward of the {\fm} in the signal path, \item Look at all components in the signal path, \item Look at all components in the signal path including those one connection removed, +% dependency tree is a logical construct. + \item Look at all components within pre-determined dependency models~\cite{cbds}[Ch.5], \item Look at all components in the system (i.e. XFMEA). \end{itemize} No current variant of FMEA gives any guidelines for which, or how many components to check for a given {\fm}. diff --git a/submission_thesis/CH4_FMMD/copy.tex b/submission_thesis/CH4_FMMD/copy.tex index 32b1ffa..aa960b0 100644 --- a/submission_thesis/CH4_FMMD/copy.tex +++ b/submission_thesis/CH4_FMMD/copy.tex @@ -1460,6 +1460,16 @@ in the base components. Coupled with MTTF statistics for the base components this allows prediction of statistical failure rates for system level failures (this is described in greater detail in section~\ref{sec:determine_fms}). % +The connections from a given system~failure can be used to determine the +components that are necessary to function correctly to avoid its occurrence. +% +% +% NO dependency trees are logical contructs, I dont think FMMD helps here +% Thus dependency trees~\cite{cbds}[Ch.5] can be derived from +% FMMD models by collecting system failure modes in terms of their +% system level application (i.e. if system level failures $\alpha,beta$ or $\gamma$ occur function $\omega$ +% of the system will be impaired, and ) +% % We can also use the FMMD model to derive information to assist in creating related models such as FTA~\cite{nucfta,nasafta}, traditional FMEA, FMECA~\cite{safeware}[p.344], FMEDA~\cite{scsh}, diagnostics schemas~\cite{dbamafta}