From 38ed644a3ef423fbed22c273e73461c3a3441495 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Robin P. Clark" Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:03:31 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] WE removal of appendix B --- submission_thesis/appendixes/algorithmic.tex | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/submission_thesis/appendixes/algorithmic.tex b/submission_thesis/appendixes/algorithmic.tex index fb8590f..4c1b683 100644 --- a/submission_thesis/appendixes/algorithmic.tex +++ b/submission_thesis/appendixes/algorithmic.tex @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ to consider are the failure modes of its components. %, as %developed in the function definition $fm : \;\mathcal{G} \rightarrow \mathcal{F}$. %The aim here is to build `test cases', -Single or combinations of failure~modes are used to create failure~mode analysis scenarios, or test cases. +Single {\fms} or combinations are used to create failure~mode analysis scenarios, or test cases. %Each failure mode (or combination of) investigated is termed a `test case'. %Each `test case' is analysed. % @@ -543,10 +543,12 @@ These results are the failure modes of the {\fg}. %This stage analyses the results from bottom-up FMEA analysis ($R$), and collects %results that, from the perspective of the functional~group, have the same failure symptom. This stage collects results into `symptom' sets. +% Each result from the preceding stage is examined and collected into common symptom sets. -That is to say, each result in a symptom set, from the perspective of the {\fg}, -has the same failure symptom. +% +That is to say, results which have a common failure symptom from the perspective of the operation of the {\fg}. +% Let set $\mathcal{SP}$ be the set of all symptoms, and $\mathcal{R}$ be the set of all test case results. %