diff --git a/submission_thesis/appendixes/algorithmic.tex b/submission_thesis/appendixes/algorithmic.tex
index fb8590f..4c1b683 100644
--- a/submission_thesis/appendixes/algorithmic.tex
+++ b/submission_thesis/appendixes/algorithmic.tex
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ to consider are the failure modes of its components.
 %, as
 %developed in the function definition $fm : \;\mathcal{G} \rightarrow \mathcal{F}$.
 %The aim here is to build `test cases', 
-Single or combinations of failure~modes are used to create failure~mode analysis scenarios, or test cases.
+Single {\fms} or combinations are used to create failure~mode analysis scenarios, or test cases.
 %Each failure mode (or combination of) investigated is termed a `test case'.
 %Each `test case' is analysed.
 %
@@ -543,10 +543,12 @@ These results are the failure modes of the {\fg}.
 %This stage analyses the results from bottom-up FMEA analysis ($R$), and collects
 %results that, from the perspective of the functional~group, have the same failure symptom.
 This stage collects results into `symptom' sets.
+%
 Each result from the preceding stage is examined and collected
 into common symptom sets.
-That is to say, each result in a symptom set, from the perspective of the {\fg},
-has the same failure symptom.
+%
+That is to say, results which have a common failure symptom from the perspective of the operation of the {\fg}.
+%
 Let set $\mathcal{SP}$ be the set of all  symptoms,
 and $\mathcal{R}$ be the set of all test case results.
 %