.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c34973f9a8
commit
37678ee9c2
@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ The spaitial relationship between the curves defines the set theoretic relations
|
||||
|
||||
The definitions above allow us to read an Euler diagram
|
||||
and write down set theory equations.
|
||||
The interest here, is to define relationships between the contours, that allow
|
||||
processing and parsing of the diagram without resorting to area operations in the concerete plane.
|
||||
The interest here though, is to define relationships between the contours, that allow
|
||||
processing and parsing of the diagram without resorting to extra area operations in the concerete plane.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Defining `pure intersection' and `enclosure'}
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||
@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ an {\em enclosure} relationship as a directed vertice and
|
||||
The diagram in figure \ref{fig:eulerg1} can now be represented as a graph thus:
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=70pt,bb=0 0 128 108,keepaspectratio=true]{./eulerg/eulerg_g.jpg}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=50pt,bb=0 0 128 108,keepaspectratio=true]{./eulerg/eulerg_g.jpg}
|
||||
% eulerg_g.jpg: 128x108 pixel, 72dpi, 4.52x3.81 cm, bb=0 0 128 108
|
||||
\caption{Graph Representaion of figure \ref{fig:eulerg1}}
|
||||
\label{fig:eulerg1_g}
|
||||
@ -175,9 +175,9 @@ becomes part of the pure~intersection~chain. Hmmmm thats true but a better way t
|
||||
%The diagram in figure \ref{fig:eulerg_enc} can be represented by the following relationships.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\vbox{
|
||||
The diagram in figure \ref{fig:eulerg_pic} can be represented by the following relationships.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
$$ M {\pin} N $$
|
||||
$$ N {\pin} O $$
|
||||
$$ O {\pin} P $$
|
||||
@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ $$ A {\enc} N $$
|
||||
$$ A {\enc} O $$
|
||||
$$ A {\enc} P $$
|
||||
$$ A {\enc} Q $$
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
To form the {\pic} we can follow
|
||||
reachable pure intersection relationships.
|
||||
@ -258,13 +258,13 @@ see figure \ref{fig:eulerg_pic_g_a_unc}.
|
||||
\section{reduction of searches for available zones}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Another property of any {\pic} $PIC$, is that
|
||||
Another property of any {\pic} $P$, is that
|
||||
the maximum number of euler zones within it is
|
||||
|
||||
$$ MaxZones = 2^{|PIC|} $$
|
||||
$$ MaxZones = 2^{|P|} $$
|
||||
|
||||
Because no contours external to the {\pic}
|
||||
bi-sect any in it, no extra zones can be formed.
|
||||
bisect any in it, no extra zones can be formed.
|
||||
By enclosing a {\pic} with
|
||||
a contour, we change the nature of the zones within
|
||||
the {\pic}, but the number of zones contributed by the {\pic}
|
||||
@ -273,6 +273,8 @@ stays the same.
|
||||
A pure intersection chain has a maximum number of possible Euler zones, and exists as independent entities in the diagram. This
|
||||
allows us to analyses {\pic}s separately, thus reducing the $2^N$ overhead of analysing an Euler diagram for available zones.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
This is to say, the the number of zones within a {\pic} is not affected by changes in the diagram
|
||||
that do not alter the {\pic}.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{40pt}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user