lunchtime edit (geddit)
This commit is contained in:
parent
419cf517e9
commit
33e1565cd2
15
mybib.bib
15
mybib.bib
@ -271,10 +271,12 @@ ISSN={Doi:10.1145/2330667.2330683},}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ARTICLE{fftoriginal,
|
||||
title={An Algorithm for the Mechine Calculation of Complex Fourier Series},
|
||||
title={An Algorithm for the Machine Calculation of Complex Fourier Series},
|
||||
author={James W. Cooley and John W. Tukey},
|
||||
journal={Mathematics of Computation},
|
||||
year={1965},
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
volume={19},
|
||||
pages={297-301},
|
||||
publisher={American Mathematical Society}
|
||||
@ -483,6 +485,13 @@ Database
|
||||
YEAR = "1991"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ARTICLE{fmeca,
|
||||
AUTHOR = "United States DOD",
|
||||
TITLE = "MIL-STD-1629A: Procedure for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis",
|
||||
JOURNAL = "United States Department of Defence",
|
||||
YEAR = "1980"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
% $Id: mybib.bib,v 1.3 2009/11/28 20:05:52 robin Exp $
|
||||
@article{Clark200519,
|
||||
title = "Failure Mode Modular De-Composition Using Spider Diagrams",
|
||||
@ -790,8 +799,8 @@ strength of materials, the causes of boiler explosions",
|
||||
|
||||
@BOOK{mil1991,
|
||||
AUTHOR = "United~States~DOD",
|
||||
TITLE = "Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment",
|
||||
PUBLISHER = "DOD",
|
||||
TITLE = "MIL-1991: Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment",
|
||||
PUBLISHER = "United States Department of Defence",
|
||||
YEAR = "1991"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
BIN
related_papers_books/FMECA_Mil-Std-1629A.pdf
Normal file
BIN
related_papers_books/FMECA_Mil-Std-1629A.pdf
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
@ -1154,20 +1154,26 @@ $ \Omega(C) = fm(C) \cup \{OK\} $).
|
||||
|
||||
The $OK$ statistical case is the (usually) largest in probability, and is therefore
|
||||
of interest when analysing systems from a statistical perspective.
|
||||
%
|
||||
For these examples, the OK state is not represented area proportionately, but is included
|
||||
in the diagrams.
|
||||
%
|
||||
This type of diagram is germane to the application of conditional probability calculations
|
||||
such as Bayes theorem~\cite{probstat}.
|
||||
|
||||
The current failure modelling methodologies (FMEA, FMECA, FTA, FMEDA) all use Bayesian
|
||||
statistics to justify their methodologies~\cite{nucfta}\cite{nasafta}.
|
||||
%
|
||||
The current failure modelling methodologies
|
||||
(FMECA~\cite{fmeca}, FTA~\cite{nucfta}\cite{nasafta}, FMEDA~\cite{en61508})
|
||||
use Bayesian
|
||||
statistics to justify their methodologies.
|
||||
%
|
||||
That is to say, a base component or a sub-system failure
|
||||
has a probability of causing given system level failures\footnote{FMECA has a $\beta$ value that directly corresponds
|
||||
to the probability that a given part failure mode will cause a given system level failure/event.}.
|
||||
|
||||
%
|
||||
Another way to view this is to consider the failure modes of a
|
||||
component, with the $OK$ state, as a universal set $\Omega$, where
|
||||
all sets within $\Omega$ are partitioned.
|
||||
%
|
||||
Figure \ref{fig:combco} shows a partitioned set representing
|
||||
component failure modes $\{ B_1 ... B_3, OK \}$: partitioned sets
|
||||
where the OK or empty set condition is included, obey unitary state conditions.
|
||||
@ -1193,7 +1199,8 @@ This would make it seemingly impossible to model as `unitary state'.
|
||||
There are two ways in which we can deal with this.
|
||||
We could consider the component a composite
|
||||
of two simpler components, and model their interaction to
|
||||
create a derived component (i.e. use FMMD on the simpler components).
|
||||
create a derived component (i.e. use FMMD).
|
||||
%
|
||||
The second way to do this would be to consider the combnations of non-mutually
|
||||
exclusive {\fms} as new {\fms}: this approach is discussed below.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user