lunchtime edit. Checked example diagram consistencies
This commit is contained in:
parent
492eb82704
commit
31ad180da6
@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ paper: paper.tex fmmd_design_aide_paper.tex
|
|||||||
#latex paper.tex
|
#latex paper.tex
|
||||||
#dvipdf paper pdflatex cannot use eps ffs
|
#dvipdf paper pdflatex cannot use eps ffs
|
||||||
pdflatex paper.tex
|
pdflatex paper.tex
|
||||||
okular paper.pdf
|
mv paper.pdf fmmd_design_aide_paper.pdf
|
||||||
|
okular fmmd_design_aide_paper.pdf
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Remove the need for referncing graphics in subdirectories
|
# Remove the need for referncing graphics in subdirectories
|
||||||
|
@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ $$ \hat{z} = \bigcap_{c \in \mathcal{X}}
|
|||||||
{interior}
|
{interior}
|
||||||
(\hat{c})
|
(\hat{c})
|
||||||
%\; \cup \;
|
%\; \cup \;
|
||||||
\cap % J.Howse correction 25MAR2011
|
\; \cap \; % J.Howse correction 25MAR2011
|
||||||
\bigcap_{\hat{c} \in \hat{C}-X}
|
\bigcap_{\hat{c} \in \hat{C}-X}
|
||||||
exterior (\hat{c})
|
exterior (\hat{c})
|
||||||
$$
|
$$
|
||||||
@ -856,24 +856,26 @@ The test case AFE represents the condition where all four engines have failed \c
|
|||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Conclusion}
|
\section{Conclusion}
|
||||||
|
% Elevator Pitch
|
||||||
PLD's provide a means to visually model failure modes within {\fgs} and after analysis
|
PLD's provide a means to visually model failure modes within {\fgs} and after analysis
|
||||||
of the test cases, extract the {\fg}'s common failure symptoms.
|
of the test cases, extract the {\fg}'s common failure symptoms.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
Because PLD's model failure modes generally, they are not constrained to
|
Because PLD's model failure modes generally, they are not constrained to
|
||||||
any particular discipline.
|
any particular discipline.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
Most methodologies are aimed at solving problems for a particular discipline,
|
Most failure mode methodologies are focussed on solving problems for a particular discipline;
|
||||||
UML for instance is only suitable for modelling software.
|
UML for instance is only suitable for modelling software;
|
||||||
FMEA, FMEDA and FMECA are good at modelling
|
FMEA, FMEDA and FMECA are good at modelling
|
||||||
electronic and mechanical systems, but struggle with software.
|
electronic and mechanical systems, but struggle with software.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
FTA models all systems, but from the top down, and rarely giving complete coverage
|
FTA models all systems, but from the top down rarely giving complete coverage
|
||||||
to all base component failure modes.
|
to all base component failure modes.
|
||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
PLD's can be used to model Mechanical, Electrical and Software
|
PLD's can be used to model Mechanical, Electrical and Software
|
||||||
failure modes. More importantly the interfaces between these disciplines can be modelled
|
failure modes. More importantly the interfaces between these disciplines can be modelled
|
||||||
seamlessly.
|
seamlessly. The bottom-up nature of its associated methodology, Failure Mode Modular De-Composition (FMMD)
|
||||||
|
ensures that complete coverage of all base~component failures modes
|
||||||
|
can be ensured.
|
||||||
% Elevator Pitch
|
% Elevator Pitch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%\pagebreak[4]
|
%\pagebreak[4]
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user