conclusion
This commit is contained in:
parent
0e887bb0fc
commit
2fecdb0771
@ -329,14 +329,31 @@ any new problems.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
First let us look at the new transistor and resistor and
|
First let us look at the new transistor and resistor and
|
||||||
treat these as a functional group.
|
treat these as a functional group.
|
||||||
In our analysis of the failure modes we have to consider
|
|
||||||
both states of the transistor, ON and OFF.
|
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||||
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
\includegraphics[width=200pt,keepaspectratio=true]{./fmmd_design_aide/test_circuit.png}
|
||||||
|
% test_circuit.png: 239x144 pixel, 72dpi, 8.43x5.08 cm, bb=0 0 239 144
|
||||||
|
\caption{Test circuit functional group}
|
||||||
|
\label{fig:test_circuit}
|
||||||
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In our analysis of the failure modes we have to consider the operational
|
||||||
|
states of this circuit, which are
|
||||||
|
the transistor being switched ON and OFF.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||||
\centering
|
\centering
|
||||||
\includegraphics[width=200pt,keepaspectratio=true]{./fmmd_design_aide/mv_opamp_circuit2.png}
|
\includegraphics[width=200pt,keepaspectratio=true]{./fmmd_design_aide/mv_opamp_circuit2.png}
|
||||||
% mv_opamp_circuit2.png: 577x479 pixel, 72dpi, 20.35x16.90 cm, bb=0 0 577 479
|
% mv_opamp_circuit2.png: 577x479 pixel, 72dpi, 20.35x16.90 cm, bb=0 0 577 479
|
||||||
\caption{Amplifier with check circuit}
|
\caption{Amplifier with check circuit addition}
|
||||||
\label{fig:mvamp2}
|
\label{fig:mvamp2}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -392,6 +409,13 @@ $\overline{TEST\_LINE}$ OFF & TC:4 $TR1$ ALWAYS OFF & resistance always adde
|
|||||||
\label{tab:testaddition}
|
\label{tab:testaddition}
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Test Cases Analysis in detail}
|
\subsection{Test Cases Analysis in detail}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The purpose of this circuit is to switch a resistance in when we want to test the circuit
|
The purpose of this circuit is to switch a resistance in when we want to test the circuit
|
||||||
@ -452,19 +476,21 @@ As a symptom for this circuit, it means that there would be no test effect.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{conclusion of FMMD analysis on safety addition}
|
\subsection{conclusion of FMMD analysis on safety addition}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This test circuit has from its four component failure modes,
|
||||||
|
3 failure symptoms $\{ NO TEST EFFECT, NO SYMPTOM, OPEN CIRCUIT \}$
|
||||||
For the FMMD analysis in table \ref{tab:testaddition} we have two failure modes for its derived component
|
For the FMMD analysis in table \ref{tab:testaddition} we have two failure modes for its derived component
|
||||||
`no~test~effect' or `open~circuit'.
|
`no~test~effect' or `open~circuit'. There
|
||||||
%~out~of~range'.
|
$NO SYMPTOM$ failure mode is dormant, but will be revealed when the test~line changes state.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The next stage is to combine the two derived components we have made into
|
The next stage is to combine the two derived components we have made into
|
||||||
a functional group.
|
a higher level functional group, see figure \ref{fig:testable_mvamp}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{FMMD Hierarchy, with milli-volt amp and safety addition}
|
\section{FMMD Hierarchy, with milli-volt amp and safety addition}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The next stage is to take the two derived components
|
We have created two derived components, the amplifier, and the test~circuit, we
|
||||||
and place them into a functional group.
|
now place them into a new functional group.
|
||||||
We can now analyse this functional
|
We can now analyse this functional
|
||||||
group w.r.t the failure modes in the two derived compoennts.
|
group w.r.t the failure modes of the two derived components.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||||
\centering
|
\centering
|
||||||
|
@ -874,9 +874,10 @@ to all base component failure modes.
|
|||||||
%
|
%
|
||||||
PLD's can be used to model Mechanical, Electrical and Software
|
PLD's can be used to model Mechanical, Electrical and Software
|
||||||
failure modes. More importantly the interfaces between these disciplines can be modelled
|
failure modes. More importantly the interfaces between these disciplines can be modelled
|
||||||
seamlessly. The bottom-up nature of its associated methodology, Failure Mode Modular De-Composition (FMMD)
|
seamlessly.
|
||||||
ensures that complete coverage of all base~component failures modes
|
%
|
||||||
can be ensured.
|
The bottom-up nature of its associated methodology, Failure Mode Modular De-Composition (FMMD)
|
||||||
|
ensures complete coverage of all base~component failures modes is possible.
|
||||||
% Elevator Pitch
|
% Elevator Pitch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%\pagebreak[4]
|
%\pagebreak[4]
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user