From 28d8495009e28857187c07611bb5ad888895dd81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Robin P. Clark" Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:00:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] last typo tonight --- submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex b/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex index cdce081..4713695 100644 --- a/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex +++ b/submission_thesis/CH2_FMEA/copy.tex @@ -1488,7 +1488,7 @@ have independent failure causes and implement redundancy. % for the SIF. This is in effect a top down de-composition of safety requirements. % This is rather like the demand for multiple engines on aircraft -that must make a long journeys over the sea to statistically limit +that must make long journeys over the sea to statistically limit the likelihood of one failure cause --- i.e. one engine failure --- causing a serious incident. % The drawback to this redundancy concept is an unexpected common failure mode~\cite{allfour}.