.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c7f75c5a47
commit
254168f341
@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ create higher level {\fg}s in later stages.
|
||||
%%-
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=200pt,bb=0 0 331 249,keepaspectratio=true]{./fmmd_hierarchy.jpg}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=200pt,bb=0 0 331 249,keepaspectratio=true]{./fmmd_concept/fmmd_hierarchy.jpg}
|
||||
% fmmd_hierarchy.jpg: 331x249 pixel, 72dpi, 11.68x8.78 cm, bb=0 0 331 249
|
||||
\caption{Example derived component created from the functional group comprised of components a,b,c}
|
||||
\label{fig:fmmd_hierarchy}
|
||||
@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ create higher level {\fg}s in later stages.
|
||||
% \vspace{20pt}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Environmental and Operational States and FMMD}
|
||||
\subsection{Environmental Conditoions, Operational States and FMMD}
|
||||
|
||||
Any real world sub-system will exist in a variable environment and may have several modes of operation.
|
||||
In order to find all possible failures, the sub-system must be analysed for each operational state
|
||||
@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ with the ENV and OP\_STAT classes associated with them
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=400pt,bb=0 0 818 249,keepaspectratio=true]{./fmmd_env_op_uml.jpg}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=400pt,bb=0 0 818 249,keepaspectratio=true]{./fmmd_concept/fmmd_env_op_uml.jpg}
|
||||
% fmmd_env_op_uml.jpg: 818x249 pixel, 72dpi, 28.86x8.78 cm, bb=0 0 818 249
|
||||
\caption{UML model of Environmental and Operational states w.r.t FMMD}
|
||||
\label{fig:env_op_uml}
|
||||
@ -769,7 +769,9 @@ for its results (MTTF and the cause trees for SYSTEM level faults).
|
||||
\item Overall reliability and danger evaluation statistics can be computed.
|
||||
By knowing all causation trees,
|
||||
the statistical probabilities (from base component data) for all causes can be simply added.
|
||||
\item A graphical representation based on Euler diagrams is used.
|
||||
\item A graphical representation based on Euler diagrams is used. Providing an interface that does not involve
|
||||
formal mathematical notation. This is intended to be user friendly and to guide the user through the FMMD process
|
||||
while applying automatic checks for unhandled conditions.
|
||||
\item From the top down the failure mode model will follow a logical de-composition of the functionality; by
|
||||
chosing {\fg}s and working bottom-up this hierarchical trait will occur as a natural consequence.
|
||||
\item Undetectable or unhandled failure modes will be specifically flagged.
|
||||
@ -781,5 +783,6 @@ chosing {\fg}s and working bottom-up this hierarchical trait will occur as a nat
|
||||
This paper provides the background for the need for a new methodology for
|
||||
static analysis that can span the mechanical electrical and software domains
|
||||
using a common notation.
|
||||
The author believes it addresses mant short comings in current static failure mode analysis methodologies.
|
||||
\vspace{60pt}
|
||||
\today
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user