re-use of fmea : another problem with it
needs more citations
This commit is contained in:
parent
7f8f04a5af
commit
24d7898669
@ -25,6 +25,13 @@
|
|||||||
doi={10.1109/CCA.1998.721666},
|
doi={10.1109/CCA.1998.721666},
|
||||||
ISSN={},}
|
ISSN={},}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@article{rudov2009language,
|
||||||
|
title={The language of FMEA: on the effective use and reuse of FMEA data},
|
||||||
|
author={Rudov-Clark, SD and Stecki, J},
|
||||||
|
journal={submitted to HUMS2009, Melbourne},
|
||||||
|
pages={10--12},
|
||||||
|
year={2009}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@TechReport{modbus,
|
@TechReport{modbus,
|
||||||
|
@ -44,6 +44,17 @@ modes in a system, multiplied by the number of components in it, we could arrive
|
|||||||
This figure would mean we could compare the maximum number of checks (i.e. rigorous analysis)
|
This figure would mean we could compare the maximum number of checks (i.e. rigorous analysis)
|
||||||
with the number actually performed.
|
with the number actually performed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\section{Re-use of FMEA analysis}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Given the {\bc} {\fm} to system level failure mode paradigm it is
|
||||||
|
difficult to re-use FMEA analysis.
|
||||||
|
Several strategies to aid re-use have been proposed~\cite{rudov2009language, reuse_of_fmea}, but
|
||||||
|
the fundamental problem remains, that, with any changes
|
||||||
|
to the component base in a system, it is very difficult to
|
||||||
|
determine which FMEA test scenarios must be re-worked.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{software and FMEA}
|
\section{software and FMEA}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Traditional FMEA deals only with electrical and mechanical components, i.e. it does not have provision for software.
|
Traditional FMEA deals only with electrical and mechanical components, i.e. it does not have provision for software.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user