re-use of fmea : another problem with it

needs more citations

mybib.bib

@@ -25,6 +25,13 @@
 	doi={10.1109/CCA.1998.721666}, 
 	ISSN={},}
 
+@article{rudov2009language,
+  title={The language of FMEA: on the effective use and reuse of FMEA data},
+  author={Rudov-Clark, SD and Stecki, J},
+  journal={submitted to HUMS2009, Melbourne},
+  pages={10--12},
+  year={2009}
+}
 
 
 @TechReport{modbus,

submission_thesis/CH3_FMEA_criticism/copy.tex

@@ -44,6 +44,17 @@ modes in a system, multiplied by the number of components in it, we could arrive
 This figure would mean we could compare the maximum number of checks (i.e. rigorous analysis)
 with the number actually performed.
 
+
+\section{Re-use of FMEA analysis}
+
+Given the {\bc} {\fm} to system level failure mode paradigm it is 
+difficult to re-use FMEA analysis.
+Several strategies to aid re-use have been proposed~\cite{rudov2009language, reuse_of_fmea}, but
+the fundamental problem remains, that, with any changes 
+to the component base in a system, it is very difficult to
+determine which FMEA test scenarios must be re-worked.
+
+
 \section{software and FMEA}
 
 Traditional FMEA deals only with electrical and mechanical components, i.e. it does not have provision for software.