Morning work...

This commit is contained in:
Robin Clark 2013-01-30 09:04:08 +00:00
parent 9ea1c0f94d
commit 2397f3d09f
7 changed files with 70 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -223,6 +223,19 @@ ISSN={0149-144X}}
%%#%% %%#%%
@INPROCEEDINGS{incrementalfmea,
author={Price, C.J.},
booktitle={Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1996 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity., Annual}, title={Effortless incremental design FMEA},
year={1996},
month={jan},
volume={},
number={},
pages={43 -47},
keywords={Automotive engineering;Circuits;Costs;Design engineering;Failure analysis;Filling;Fires;Performance analysis;Power engineering and energy;Software tools;circuit analysis computing;circuit reliability;design engineering;failure analysis;Flame system;computer simulation;electrical engineering;electrical systems;failure mode and effects analysis;incremental design FMEA;reliability;software;},
doi={10.1109/RAMS.1996.500640},
ISSN={0149-144X},}
@ARTICLE{sfmea, @ARTICLE{sfmea,
AUTHOR = "Chris Price, Neal Snooke", AUTHOR = "Chris Price, Neal Snooke",
TITLE = "An Automated Software FMEA", TITLE = "An Automated Software FMEA",
@ -231,9 +244,56 @@ ISSN={0149-144X}}
} }
% my bib file. % my bib file.
@INPROCEEDINGS{automatingFMEA1281774,
author={Papadopoulos, Y. and Parker, D. and Grante, C.},
booktitle={High Assurance Systems Engineering, 2004. Proceedings. Eighth IEEE International Symposium on}, title={Automating the failure modes and effects analysis of safety critical systems},
year={2004},
month={march},
volume={},
number={},
pages={ 310 - 311},
keywords={Aerospace engineering;Aerospace industry;Aerospace safety;Automotive engineering;Cause effect analysis;Computer architecture;Data engineering;Failure analysis;Performance analysis;Software performance; data flow analysis; fault trees; safety-critical software; software architecture; software fault tolerance; FMEA; component failure modes; data flow; data transactions; failure effect analysis; failure mode analysis; fault simulation; fault tree analysis; safety critical systems; software design; software development; system models; system safety analysis; system topology;},
doi={10.1109/HASE.2004.1281774},
ISSN={1530-2059},}
@INPROCEEDINGS{1372150,
author={Hartkopf, S.},
booktitle={Software Technology and Engineering Practice, 2003. Eleventh Annual International Workshop on},
title={From a single discipline risk management approach to an interdisciplinary one: adaptation of FMEA to software needs},
year={2003},
month={sept.},
volume={},
number={},
pages={ 204 - 213},
keywords={Automotive engineering;Computer industry;Electrical engineering;Engineering management;Failure analysis;Organizations;Production engineering;Project management;Risk management;Software engineering; failure analysis; project management; risk management; software development management; FMEA adaptation; STEP2003; Workshop of Interdisciplinary Software Engineering; failure modes-and-effects analysis; interdisciplinary projects; interdisciplinary risk management; nonsoftware products; project management task; single discipline risk management; software needs; software products;},
doi={10.1109/STEP.2003.12},
ISSN={},}
@INPROCEEDINGS{5754453,
author={Snooke, N. and Price, C.},
booktitle={Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 2011 Proceedings - Annual}, title={Model-driven automated software FMEA},
year={2011},
month={jan.},
volume={},
number={},
pages={1 -6},
keywords={Analytical models;Fault diagnosis;Hardware;Programming;Software;Testing;Unified modeling language;safety-critical software;MISRA C;component diagrams;low-level languages;low-level programming;model-driven automated software FMEA;model-driven software developments;safety critical embedded systems;sequence diagrams;software development philosophy;software effects analysis;software failure mode;source code embedded testing;state charts;use case diagram;Failure modes and effects analysis;model-driven software development;software FMEA;},
doi={10.1109/RAMS.2011.5754453},
ISSN={0149-144X},}
Baiqiao HUANG Baiqiao HUANG
@INPROCEEDINGS{FMECAresearch,
author={Ying Chen and Cui Ye and Bingdong Liu and Rui Kang},
booktitle={Prognostics and System Health Management (PHM), 2012 IEEE Conference on}, title={Status of FMECA research and engineering application},
year={2012},
month={may},
volume={},
number={},
pages={1 -9},
keywords={automobile industry;electronics industry;failure analysis;military standards;product quality;reliability;research and development;risk analysis;China;FMECA automotive industries standards;FMECA electronic industries standards;FMECA engineering application status;FMECA military standards;FMECA research status;FMECA technology;NEC;Philips;QS9000;RPN;computer aided analysis;data accumulation;failure mode analysis methods;failure mode effect and criticality analysis;inter-department cooperation;international companies;product reliability;reliability analysis method;risk analysis;risk assessment;simulation tools;timed FMECA;FMECA;application status;current research;failure mechanism;standard;},
doi={10.1109/PHM.2012.6228914},
ISSN={2166-563X},}
Software FMEA Approach Based on Failure Modes Software FMEA Approach Based on Failure Modes
Database Database

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

View File

@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ use.
It then reveals common flaws It then reveals common flaws
which make them unsuitable for the higher safety requirements of the 21st century. which make them unsuitable for the higher safety requirements of the 21st century.
% %
Problems with state explosion in failure mode reasoning and the impossibility Problems with state explosion in failure mode reasoning and the current impossibility
of integrating software and hardware failure mode models are the most obvious of these. %flaws. of integrating software and hardware failure mode models~\cite{1372150} are the most obvious of these. %flaws.
% %
The four current methodologies are described in chapter~\ref{sec:chap2} and %the advantages and drawbacks The four current methodologies are described in chapter~\ref{sec:chap2} and %the advantages and drawbacks
%of each FMEA variant are examined %of each FMEA variant are examined

View File

@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ how failures could affect some equipment in %an initial
a brain-storming session a brain-storming session
%in product design, %in product design,
to formal submission as part of safety critical certification. to formal submission as part of safety critical certification.
When performed as part of a safety critical certification process FMEA
is a time consuming business. To reduce amount of work to perform,
software packages and analysis strategies have been developed~\cite{incrementalfmea, automatingFMEA1281774}.
% %
FMEA is always performed in context. That is, the equipment is always analysed for a particular purpose FMEA is always performed in context. That is, the equipment is always analysed for a particular purpose
and in a given environment. An `O' ring for instance can fail by leaking and in a given environment. An `O' ring for instance can fail by leaking
@ -725,9 +728,10 @@ will return most cost benefit.
% \caption{A10 Thunderbolt} % \caption{A10 Thunderbolt}
% \label{fig:f16missile} % \label{fig:f16missile}
% \end{figure} % \end{figure}
Emphasis on determining criticality of failure. Emphasis on determining criticality rather than the cost of system failures.
Applies some Bayesian statistics (probabilities of component failures and those thereby causing given system level failures). Applies some Bayesian statistics (probabilities of component failures and those
~\cite{bayesfrequentist} thereby causing given system level failures)~\cite{bayesfrequentist}.
A history of the usage and development of FMECA may be found in~\cite{FMECAresearch}.