...
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b53515ea6
commit
2216934323
@ -1139,11 +1139,11 @@ and danger evaluation statistics sourced from the component failure mode statist
|
|||||||
% advance a {\fg} to a {\dc}.
|
% advance a {\fg} to a {\dc}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\item{ From the top down the failure mode model should follow a logical de-composition of the functionality
|
% \item{ From the top down the failure mode model should follow a logical de-composition of the functionality
|
||||||
to smaller and smaller functional modules \cite{maikowski}.}
|
% to smaller and smaller functional modules \cite{maikowski}.}
|
||||||
The bottom-up approach fulfils the logical de-composition requirement, because the {\fg}s
|
% The bottom-up approach fulfils the logical de-composition requirement, because the {\fg}s
|
||||||
are built from components performing a given task.
|
% are built from components performing a given task.
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\item{ Multiple failure modes (conjunction) may be modelled from the base component level up.}
|
\item{ Multiple failure modes (conjunction) may be modelled from the base component level up.}
|
||||||
By breaking the problem of failure mode analysis into small stages
|
By breaking the problem of failure mode analysis into small stages
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user