.
This commit is contained in:
parent
64cfeffeca
commit
1bf848f942
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ These are described using the Algorithm environment in the next section \ref{alg
|
||||
By defining the process and describing it using set theory, constraints and
|
||||
verification checks in the process are stated formally.
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\clearpage
|
||||
%\clearpage
|
||||
\subsection{ Determine Failure Modes to examine}
|
||||
|
||||
The first stage is to find the failure modes to consider for
|
||||
@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ $$ DTC(F) = TC $$
|
||||
\ENDIF
|
||||
|
||||
\IF{Double fault checking}
|
||||
\STATE { let $f1,f2$ represet a component failure modes, and $c$ a component in the functional group }
|
||||
\STATE { let $f1,f2$ represet a component failure modes, and $c$ any component in the functional group }
|
||||
%\ENSURE { That all failure modes are represented in at least one test case }
|
||||
\ENSURE { $ \forall f1,f2 \;where\; (f1,f2) \not\in c\;such\;that\; (f1,f2 \in F)) \wedge ( \{f1,f2\} \in \bigcup TC) $ }
|
||||
\COMMENT { This corresponds to checking that each possible double failure mode is considered
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user