diff --git a/symptom_ex_process/introduction.tex b/symptom_ex_process/introduction.tex
index 5a8e86c..34775a4 100644
--- a/symptom_ex_process/introduction.tex
+++ b/symptom_ex_process/introduction.tex
@@ -12,9 +12,7 @@ In the field of safety engineering this derived component  corresponds to a low~
 %The technique uses a graphical notation, based on Euler\cite{eulerviz} and Constraint diagrams\cite{constraint} to model failure modes and failure mode common symptom collection.  The technique is designed for making building blocks for a hierarchical fault model.
 %
 Once the failure modes have been determined for a sub-system/{\dc},
-this {\dc} can be combined with others to form {\fgs} groups
-to model 
-higher level sub-systems/{\dcs}. 
+this {\dc} can be combined with others to form {\fgs} to model higher level sub-systems/{\dcs}. 
 %
 In this way a hierarchy to represent the fault behaviour
 of a system can be built from the bottom~up. This process can continue
@@ -30,7 +28,7 @@ Once a hierarchy is in place, it can be converted into a fault data model.
 From the fault data model, automatic generation
 of FTA \cite{nasafta} (Fault Tree Analysis) and mimimal cuts sets \cite{nucfta} are possible. 
 Also statistical reliability/probability of failure~on~demand \cite{en61508} and MTTF (Mean Time to Failure) calculations can be produced 
-automatically \footnote{Where component failure mode statistics are available \cite{mil1991}}.
+automatically\footnote{Where component failure mode statistics are available \cite{mil1991}}.
 %
 This chapter focuses on the process of converting {\fgs} to {\dcs}, or building the `blocks' of the FMMD hierarchy. 
 We can term this stage in FMMD analysis as the `symptom extraction' process. 
diff --git a/symptom_ex_process/paper.tex b/symptom_ex_process/paper.tex
index 5fc4df1..9a2edf2 100644
--- a/symptom_ex_process/paper.tex
+++ b/symptom_ex_process/paper.tex
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 \usepackage{amsfonts,amsmath,amsthm}
 \usepackage{algorithm}
 \usepackage{algorithmic}
+\usepackage{lastpage}
 \usepackage{ifthen}
 \newboolean{paper}
 \setboolean{paper}{true} % boolvar=true or false
@@ -16,6 +17,15 @@
 
 \begin{document}
 \pagestyle{fancy}
+\fancyhf{}
+%\renewcommand{\chaptermark}[1]{\markboth{ \emph{#1}}{}}
+\fancyhead[LO]{}
+\fancyhead[RE]{\leftmark}
+%\fancyfoot[LE,RO]{\thepage}
+\cfoot{Page \thepage\ of \pageref{LastPage}}
+\rfoot{\today}
+\lhead{The Symptom Extraction process of FMMD}
+
 
 %\outerhead{{\small\bf Symptom Extraction Process}}         
 %\innerfoot{{\small\bf R.P. Clark } }   
diff --git a/symptom_ex_process/top_down_de_comp.dia b/symptom_ex_process/top_down_de_comp.dia
index 7814090..4e875ae 100644
Binary files a/symptom_ex_process/top_down_de_comp.dia and b/symptom_ex_process/top_down_de_comp.dia differ
diff --git a/symptom_ex_process/top_down_de_comp.jpg b/symptom_ex_process/top_down_de_comp.jpg
index ae0dc89..eb2526d 100644
Binary files a/symptom_ex_process/top_down_de_comp.jpg and b/symptom_ex_process/top_down_de_comp.jpg differ
diff --git a/symptom_ex_process/topbot.tex b/symptom_ex_process/topbot.tex
index 2928c2a..f5426ea 100644
--- a/symptom_ex_process/topbot.tex
+++ b/symptom_ex_process/topbot.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 
-\section{Fault Finding  \\ and Failure Mode Analysis}
+\section{Fault Finding and Failure Mode Analysis}
 
 \subsection{Static Analysis}
 
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ can be derived.
 FMMD can model electrical, mechanical and software using a common notation,
 and can thus model an entire electro-mechanical software controlled system.
 
-\subsection{Top Down or \\ natural trouble shooting}
+\subsection{Top Down or natural trouble shooting}
 It is interesting here to look at the `natural' trouble shooting process.
 Fault finding is instinctively performed from the top-down.
 A faulty piece of equipment is examined and will have a 
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ Top down formal fault isolation/finding techniques for electronics are described
 %%
 
 %% insert diagram here
+
 \begin{figure}[h]
  \centering
  \includegraphics[width=300pt,bb=0 0 587 445,keepaspectratio=true]{symptom_ex_process/top_down_de_comp.jpg}
@@ -85,7 +86,10 @@ The effects on the functional group can then be collected as common symptoms,
 and now we may treat the functional group as a component, as it has a known set of failure modes.
 %
 By reusing the `components' derived from functional~groups an entire
-hierarichal failure mode of the system can be built.
+hierarichal failure mode model of the system can be built.
+That is to say, using derived components in higher level functional groups
+a hierarchy is naturally formed.
+%
 By working from the bottom up, we can trace all possible sources
 that could cause a particular mode of equipment failure.
 This means that at the design stage of a product all component failure
@@ -114,7 +118,7 @@ These are listed in table~\ref{tab:symexdef}.
 
 A system, is any coherent entity that would be sold as a product. % safety critical product.
 A sub-system is a system that is part of some larger system.
-For instance a stereo amplifier separate is a sub-system. The 
+For instance a stereo amplifier separate/slave is a sub-system. The 
 whole sound system, consists perhaps of the following `sub-systems': 
 CD-player, tuner, amplifier~separate, loudspeakers and ipod~interface.